Too Little, Too Late? - NY Times Finally Pulls Out the All the Stops on Climate Change
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Human Caused Climate Change is Real?
I'm all for being optimistic, many people don't like going to work even if it's their own business; work hard play hard and make no distinction between the two!!!
The problem with solar and wind energy has always been that they are intermittent. When you need the energy, it isn't there. Conversely, during a gale, there may be too much wind energy and turbines have to be closed down to avoid damage. The traditional solution is battery storage but it's expensive and inefficient. Also large-scale use of lithium batteries is a fire risk. But now there is an alternative: cryogenic air.
The principle is ridiculously simple. Surplus energy is used to liquefy air, which is stored in insulated tanks. When energy is needed, the liquid air is allowed to warm up again and expand into a huge volume of gas. This drives a turbine which generates electricity in the traditional way.
The problem with solar and wind energy has always been that they are intermittent. When you need the energy, it isn't there. Conversely, during a gale, there may be too much wind energy and turbines have to be closed down to avoid damage. The traditional solution is battery storage but it's expensive and inefficient. Also large-scale use of lithium batteries is a fire risk. But now there is an alternative: cryogenic air.
The principle is ridiculously simple. Surplus energy is used to liquefy air, which is stored in insulated tanks. When energy is needed, the liquid air is allowed to warm up again and expand into a huge volume of gas. This drives a turbine which generates electricity in the traditional way.
Thank you, Hazel. I would be very interested in learning more of this technology. We humans may be the principle problem, and also the answer at the same time. If we are to find a solution to our energy (and other) problems, it will come through human genius, and not through self-loathing and hand wringing.
The non-procreation due to overpopulation argument is tired and ultimately doomed from the start.
Those who decide not to procreate to supposedly save the planet, simply remove their DNA from the gene pool. The vast majority continue to procreate, not subscribing to the same ideology. As a result the ideology dies out with the individual.
While those who don't care, thrive and multiply...
There is a case for it all the same. Don't procreate and you can be confident that your children won't have to deal with the hellish world beyond the tipping point. Then you can tell yourself that what happens to other people's children after you are dead isn't your problem.
The non-procreation due to overpopulation argument is tired and ultimately doomed from the start.
Those who decide not to procreate to supposedly save the planet, simply remove their DNA from the gene pool. The vast majority continue to procreate, not subscribing to the same ideology. As a result the ideology dies out with the individual.
While those who don't care, thrive and multiply...
right on.
and while thriving and multiplying, the prolific are much more likely to create (or pro-create) the answer to human problems.
Last edited by dogpatch; 08-30-2019 at 11:24 AM.
Reason: add 'prolific'
I suppose it could be argued that we (or at least those who survived) would be "better off" if some cataclysm wiped out say half the global population but I'm banking on there are benefits to humans and civilizations and a safety net against a cataclysm in climate is a good thing partly because it may avoid cataclysm. Certainly any improvement is a good thing but it isn't like the odds are heavily against major changes in sources of clean energy.
Perhaps you've heard of Taylor Wilson, the boy who started building a fusion reactor in his parents garage that was successfully completed when he was just 14. This not onlyb made him one of just 32 people who have ever done so but also the youngest. He wants his life to be dedicated to making the world safer and better and he has a plan that is modeled after the Thorium Salt reactor with some rather important leaps in performance and safety.
If we don't discover new antibiotics or new methods to fight the superbugs over population might not be a problem. At moment there is no incentive by the pharmaceutical companies to do any research.
If we don't discover new antibiotics or new methods to fight the superbugs over population might not be a problem. At moment there is no incentive by the pharmaceutical companies to do any research.
Well, no. Because hospitals (understandably) won't use new antibiotics for fear of bacteria becoming resistant to them. They just buy a small amount and keep it in stock for emergencies. So no one can make money out of antibiotics any more and that is why there are no new ones being developed.
In the old days, new antibiotics were used freely and were so profitable that there were always newer ones coming down the line, so resistance was not a problem. Another example of capitalism at work!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.