LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Not seeing any issues here, but FWIW in my experience the message in the taskbar is *extremely* unreliable when trying to diagnose what domain is actually holding up a page load. Is anyone else seeing LQ slowness today?
Seems to be OK now. Fingers crossed. I've installed NoScript in Firefox, but haven't done anything to configure it yet, so whether that's sorted out the problem or not I don't know.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Of course, with the caveat that if everyone used them, most websites (including LQ) wouldn't exist
Interestingly, every single member who posted in this thread has enough posts that they shouldn't see any ads on LQ anyway.
Yes but other things like google analytics which is on almost every website on the web get blocked by NoScript as well.
It also keeps one from accidentally opening a 4000 page PDF.
Another nice add on is WOT (Web of Trust) - It helps to keep one away from known bad sites (and even shows "warning" for Experts-Exchange so you don't accidentally stumble into one of their BS posts when choosing from your Google'd results.
Personally I wouldn't mind ads if they were simply images loaded on the servers I visited as they were in the early days. However, with the advent of pop-ups and other annoying things that made web pages hard to see and the fact that most ads these days are links to other servers than the ones visited I feel no compunction blocking all of them. It's one thing for a company to try to get its message out - it's another thing to hijack my resources and obfuscate real content to do it.
Of course this isn't unique to the web. When loud annoying commercials pop up on the TV I immediately change the channel or mute it. If they would just leave it at normal volume I might actually watch the commercial (and often do). Some are quite amusing like the Geico ones. On radio I almost automatically change the station once commercials come on.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.