GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It is a bit sad to me that there are so many other great distros out there and yet Ubuntu is getting pushed. Their track record sucks as a stable distro. With only one in three releases being very stable that makes them not much better then MS Windows in my book. There are so many other distros that actually release a stable product but since Ubuntu has the advertizing buck, that is what is pushed. Makes me a bit sick actually. I hope their move to Debian's testing branch instead of Debian's unstable branch makes a difference for them as their work is embarrassing to the open-source community currently.
Rolling as in rolling-release? Like Arch? I likes the sound of that...
May have to try it out.
If you like to update to the latest stuff on a regular basis, you should check out Gentoo. I update about every day or two. The install can be fun tho. It's not a GUI. You also have to compile everything from source.
Rolling as in rolling-release? Like Arch? I likes the sound of that...
May have to try it out.
Quote from distrowatch:
Quote:
An interesting diversion for the developers of Linux Mint - the usual Ubuntu base has been replaced with Debian's testing branch to create a new, rolling-release edition of Linux Mint. From the announcement: " more
They are still only a business selling a substandard product to computer iliterate users (but people are learning quick!!!)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv502
Micro$oft has a reputation of doing anything to distract or debunk any OS that is of any competition to them.
Of course ! but the power of linux is that it is FREE (both from money and political control) and very very very reliable, which is why LINUX is the most popular embedded OS, you will find it in almost all mission critical systems from the nuclear industry to NASA and it is growing at an exponential rate in popularity, mostly in the professional world, linux can run on more hardware platforms than M$, take the embedded king 'ARM' which is the worlds number one embedded chip, you have one in your phone and probably in your flatscreen TV and linux runs perfectly well, windows CE is just too slow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv502
Like I said earlier, I just want linux to have a decent market share so hardware vendors can support linux as well.
The domestic market will come soon, but for now linux is penetrating the embedded world
I specifically looked forever back in 2008 to specifically ensure that my Acer Aspire One came with Linux.
And my desktop? I built it the same way others might build a Hackintosh, but with the OS to ensure compatibility with in question being Linux, not Mac OS X.
And my desktop? I built it the same way others might build a Hackintosh, but with the OS to ensure compatibility with in question being Linux, not Mac OS X.
I don't understand.
Anyway, at least I don't have to worry about that because I build my own PC. I find it downright strange that you can't buy computers without any OS.
I specifically looked forever back in 2008 to specifically ensure that my Acer Aspire One came with Linux.
And my desktop? I built it the same way others might build a Hackintosh, but with the OS to ensure compatibility with in question being Linux, not Mac OS X.
This is an example for you, my friends!
I had an AAOD250, and I had so many problems with it...
- On random occasions, my Ethernet wouldn't show up in the BIOS, so I couldn't use it in any OS.
- The battery would not charge past 70%.
- Terrible build quality.
- The HDD bay screws are too fragile.
- Even in Linux, the Intel Atom is way too underpowered.
I recently sold my AAOD250 and opted for a new MacBook Pro and have been a happier person ever since. With the MCP89 kernel patch for 7,1 MBP , Linux runs almost perfectly on the system. (With some minor tweaks.)
Last edited by lupusarcanus; 09-29-2010 at 12:44 AM.
Reason: Spelling.
I have heard good reviews from the LMDE users that I have come across. I haven't tried it myself but they claim it is now lighting fast, stable as the day is long and such things. Also, unlike Ubuntu, supposedly it is 100% compatible with the Debian testing repo. Sounds impressive anyway.
Only thing about LMDE that's a little off is that VB Guest Additions don't work...
...other than that, everything's great!
Seriously though, I haven't had the chance to try it out on real hardware...I don't feel like burning yet another CD. I've got plenty of distros burned already (from when I was distro-hopping on my P4 2.8 GHz desktop ).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.