GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
That's the wonder of 'X'! The utilitarian aspects of 'X' has provided the means to have the ability to create useful DE & Desktops. If your not happy then you as a user can create your own with 'X' or modify existing. This same applies to GNU/Linux generally but try that with M$ restrictions.
With a M$ system you are limited by the restrictions of the developers. Sure you can modify within that environment but limited or restrictive.
I think the unified means that a GNU/Linux system provides is the biggest advantage to a user. If you don't like the basics then openly modify to suit your needs. Try doing that with a M$ system, environment or application.
Probably the other way around for me. Web browsing in Firefox and watching videos in mplayer (which I start from the command line) probably account for 95% of my computer usage.
The GUI was created just for convenience to those who didn't like using the command line.
This hits the nail right on the head. Computers (as we know them today) started with the CLI. Actually, the CLI was invented as a way to interact with a computing machine more clearly than with buttons/switches! It's usually about convenience, not always necessity.
As for me, it depends on which of my computers I'm on. On this machine, I'll open up an X terminal (rarely leave X) to do something more often than I'll use a GUI program for it. On Ubuntu, however, my needs on that machine are slightly different (if that makes any sense :-S), and I tend to use the CLI/GUI about 50:50.
You know what, forget all that. I think I should seriously vow to not respond to this thread again...I'm starting to turn into a troll.
You know what, forget all that. I think I should seriously vow to not respond to this thread again...I'm starting to turn into a troll.
me too.......
You are right mattvdh!
Everyone here is going to stop using linux right now and move over to windows..... mostly because we miss the hour glass mouse pointer, amongst other thin~~~~~~~~~(This application has caused an exception blah blah blah .. . .... .. ... ......
Last edited by dakoder; 05-17-2010 at 07:33 AM.
Reason: cos(it)*felt - good
The Windows click-to-raise focus policy is the worst thing you can possibly imagine. I often like to have a small window above a maximized window, but when I start working in the maximized window the little window hides. ARRRRGGGH!!!
I really like what's called "Sloppy Focus". That's when windows are focused when the mouse moves into them, and they only raise when clicked on the title.
I heard that you can do that in Windows, but it requires you do download extra software.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.