LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: UNIX is better than WINDOWS
what?HELLO.i am UNIX. the best! 605 68.52%
whooa, wait a minute. Windows is BETTER than UNIX 48 5.44%
hoo-boy..i don't like both. 64 7.25%
errr...i don't know, what is UNIX afterall? 11 1.25%
windows?never heard of it... 155 17.55%
Voters: 883. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 05-15-2010, 05:43 PM   #3391
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146

What I use now is: Silver + cracked uxtheme.dll and Resource Hacker to make all the ugly green things into a darkish blue, with customizations all over the place. (Eg, hover text on start button reads: "Click here to begin. I ALREADY KNEW THAT *******.")

Resource Hacker and the uxtheme.dll are both free and fairly easy to obtain and don't come with any luggage at all. If anyone here still uses XP, this method is highly recommended!
 
Old 05-15-2010, 07:36 PM   #3392
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
Although, Linux does not support my wireless (ether USB belkin OR onboard).
I wish it did.
You shouldn't support Belkin either. They make the biggest #$%@^ pieces of @$@#$^#@#%@%^#@@&**!!!!! I really despise their equipment.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 07:47 PM   #3393
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
I try to support Atheros as they seem to make good drivers for Linux. I'm using one now; ar5007eg. Works out of the box on most newer GNU/Linux distributions...
 
Old 05-15-2010, 09:28 PM   #3394
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by damgar View Post
You shouldn't support Belkin either. They make the biggest #$%@^ pieces of @$@#$^#@#%@%^#@@&**!!!!! I really despise their equipment.
It was cheapest and i am on an extremely tight budget.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 09:55 PM   #3395
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
It was cheapest and i am on an extremely tight budget.
It's always the cheapest because it's crap. Customers buy them for that reason and then expect me to configure them for free, but they frequently just don't work and can't be made to, and they take twice as long at a minimum to the other common brands. They cost me time and money. I'm actually telling the girls that take the orders to start telling the customers that they are on their own if they buy Belkin.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 10:20 PM   #3396
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
I can configure my own thank you.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 10:31 PM   #3397
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
I would assume so, but most people can't even plug them in correctly. Sad but true. I do at least 4 service calls each week, and sometimes that many in a day where someone was told to unplug their router and plug it back in and has managed to get every wire wrong.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 10:44 PM   #3398
mattvdh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: 0
Ok, so I'll reply to a couple of users in one shot.

first of all, the time it takes to install and find drivers really doesn't matter anymore because of imaging, which can be done in a matter of minutes on a gigabyte network.


2nd: If you don't like XP's interface there's a ton of software available to really sweeten it up. like:

http://www.stardock.com/products/

http://www.astonshell.com/a2menu/ (uses opengl)

http://windows.kde.org/

You can easily make XP look like OSX, Gnome, KDE, or something totally different made by artists. The cursors, icons, sounds, themes can be modified in XP. And 7 is even better.

Last edited by mattvdh; 05-15-2010 at 10:48 PM.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 10:51 PM   #3399
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
Ok, so I'll reply to a couple of users in one shot.

first of all, the time it takes to install and find drivers really doesn't matter anymore because of imaging, which can be done in a matter of minutes on a gigabyte network.


2nd: If you don't like XP's interface there's a ton of software available to really sweeten it up. like:

http://www.stardock.com/products/

http://www.astonshell.com/a2menu/ (uses opengl)

http://windows.kde.org/
Why do you always reference XP? It was released just shy of 9 years ago. Even microsoft wishes it would die. I bet windows 98 would absolutely FLY on my current hardware if drivers could be found.
 
Old 05-15-2010, 10:55 PM   #3400
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by damgar View Post
Why do you always reference XP? It was released just shy of 9 years ago. Even microsoft wishes it would die. I bet windows 98 would absolutely FLY on my current hardware if drivers could be found.
DSL is faster then win 95 on old hw!
 
Old 05-16-2010, 03:37 AM   #3401
DrLove73
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Srbobran, Serbia
Distribution: CentOS 5.5 i386 & x86_64
Posts: 1,118
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
first of all, the time it takes to install and find drivers really doesn't matter anymore because of imaging, which can be done in a matter of minutes on a gigabyte network.
Not if you install PC's for a living you don't. And I do it for 10 years now. Arghhhh. If you want to install XP with all the patches and bells and whistles like .Net, and all Applications people need to start using it as soon as they (read "I") plug it in without my second, third, etc visit, on a new PC you see for the first time takes minimum 4 Hours. Automated!!!

And if you are reinstalling PC for a new customer,and try to use backuped settings from previous installation, add another 1-2 hours to do it right.

Then add 30 minutes to create a Ghost copy and another 45-60 minutes if you have to reinstall so you first have to backup their old/ruined system.

And if you try even to imply that it does not take you that much time you are either ignorant, slacker or a HUGE LIAR. Take your pick or better accept that after 10 years of installing PC's for a living I DO KNOW what I am talking about. This includes PC's from 286 to SLI powered monsters, and from DOS 5.x to Windows 7 with all of the incarnations in between.
 
Old 05-16-2010, 05:39 AM   #3402
dakoder
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Swindon Wiltshire England Earth
Distribution: Debian, mint-9, tinycore
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
What's wrong with you people?! XP takes a maximum of 45 minutes to an hour to install. It generally takes me about a half hour with my PC and most PC's I've installed it on. And why didn't you get WiFi working? There's really no reason why the WiFi shouldn't work in XP.
your right Mat !.... vista worked well with the wifi. My wife likes windows but the advent dual core laptop died, so in went a new hard drive, partitioned it with two NTFS partitions... installed XP (about 40 minutes with no problems), installed MINT 8 with GRUB (roughly the same amout of time, no problems).
set up my toolbars and themes (10 minutes).... used the wi-fi with firefox and installed 'flash' (5 minutes) great !!!

re-booted into XP and started installing the drivers from the OEM disk, and after three hours of trying to get the WIFI working I have given up. The issue is with the drivers, the SAD thing is that I am not at all surprised by these events.



Graham
 
Old 05-16-2010, 06:19 AM   #3403
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
first of all, the time it takes to install and find drivers really doesn't matter anymore because of imaging, which can be done in a matter of minutes on a gigabyte network.
Yeah, if you use imaging, or customised install media, or any of a range of possibilities, installing Windows isn't so bad. But preparing the image/media/whatever takes a lot of time.

Also, when I was installing Vista on a bunch of machines by using Windows PE and imagex, the time WinPE took to format the hard drive was itself well over half an hour. Not even a particularly big drive. Maybe I'd missed out some quicker way to do it, but I'd followed Microsoft's own documentation on the matter.
 
Old 05-16-2010, 07:23 AM   #3404
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
Ok, so I'll reply to a couple of users in one shot.

first of all, the time it takes to install and find drivers really doesn't matter anymore because of imaging, which can be done in a matter of minutes on a gigabyte network.


2nd: If you don't like XP's interface there's a ton of software available to really sweeten it up. like:

http://www.stardock.com/products/

http://www.astonshell.com/a2menu/ (uses opengl)

http://windows.kde.org/

You can easily make XP look like OSX, Gnome, KDE, or something totally different made by artists. The cursors, icons, sounds, themes can be modified in XP. And 7 is even better.
But in Linux the desktop itself is theme-able without third-party addons. And you are free to use a completely different desktop if you want, because Linux does not have any desktop or GUI integrated into it.

In fact the distro I use doesn't have a GUI when you install it. It's optional. If you want it, install it yourself.

One of the best thing about Unix is that it's modular. It's just a whole bunch of little, separate programs that work together to make up a usable system, unlike Windows's inpenetrable icky ball of cruft engulfing pretty much everything.

And as mentioned, Linux programs each have their own, sepatate human-readable and editable config files, each for every user, instead of a registry.
 
Old 05-16-2010, 09:10 AM   #3405
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
But in Linux the desktop itself is theme-able without third-party addons.
In GNU/Linux, the whole concept of "third party" has little meaning, since everything is made by different people. As you mention, GNU/Linux distros are formed by the combination of many components, any of which can be changed for an alternative.

A better way to express it would be "Most distros have a highly configurable desktop by default".
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
business, kenny's_playground, microsoft, register, technical, windows, worm, wtf



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux-windows Dual boot question when upgrading from windows 2000 to XP sarikalinux Linux - Newbie 1 03-09-2006 02:21 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 35 02-07-2006 03:29 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 4 11-10-2005 11:37 AM
Red Hat Linux 9 + Windows Server 2003 + Windows XP + Fedora in same domain wolfy339 Linux - Networking 5 03-02-2005 06:03 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration