SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'll echo GazL a bit in that I'm not interested in being beholden to whatever new shiny thing DE's are doing these days. Gnome 3 burned me as well as KDE at one point. i3 will probably never change that substantially...
All that said, I'm curious what PV *himself* is running. That may have something to do with 'the wait'. Perhaps he doesnt like Plasma and thinks KDE4 is the kats meow. Perhaps he doesnt use either and wants to move to XFCE only... who knows. I'd love to know how he feels about the current state of DE's in general....
Our feelings matter not
Last edited by tramtrist; 10-08-2019 at 11:25 AM.
Reason: emphasis
xfce is fine for me and i don't think i could do with it ;plasma on the other hand just seems to be a decandent extravagance . I just need to see what i'm looking at not things bouncing
XFCE seems the most 'stable' of the big DEs.. though that's what I thought of KDE at one point. But since moving to i3 I'll never move again until it's gone.
Personally, I'm depressed by the technical knowledge required to build all the huge packages. Ideally they would be neither huge, nor require the technical might of someone like Eric in order to be built. But I guess these are the days we live in!
This is why I turned my back on the big DEs long ago. They're just not worth the effort. IMHO.
I am 100% in-line with you here. As you well said, impressed by the technical might, but depressed by the complexity.
I don't use a DE. I would be perfectly fine with a fluxbox desktop. I have been using icewm for many years (so muscle memory has built up) but I perfectly understand that most people want (or maybe just are used to) a desktop environment.
It's probably part of a global trend towards more ease of use at the price of more complexity (look at modern cars )
All that said, I'm curious what PV *himself* is running. That may have something to do with 'the wait'. Perhaps he doesnt like Plasma and thinks KDE4 is the kats meow. Perhaps he doesnt use either and wants to move to XFCE only... who knows. I'd love to know how he feels about the current state of DE's in general....
Our feelings matter not
I can offer some theories here. Pat said in an earlier thread that he has used Xfce as his main DE for a while now. A few days ago I had a rather lengthy discussion with a confidant of mine, let's call him [which I shall transcribe on my blog soon], who ran Unix/Slackware for many years. He left Slackware when KDE4 came out because he detested Plasma. He's old school, likes Unix to be traditional and hated the fact that KDE had removed some functionality, tried to make it look like OSX while simultaneously removing some of its stability. Essentially it had gone backwards, as far as he saw it, since he had been using KDE since beta 2.
I would venture that he and Pat share similar points of view about the current state and unnecessary complexity of modern DEs. I imagine what we are seeing here is a tug of war - albeit an amicable one, one would hope - between Pat and Eric, with moving Plasma 5 into Slackware being on one end of the rope and removing KDE altogether being on the other end. If that really is the case I imagine the latter will eventually win out.
In my own opinion, Slackware does not need KDE at all. Xfce is perfectly suitable.
Last edited by Lysander666; 10-08-2019 at 11:40 AM.
One user's input: I would love to see 15.0 or at least -current with both Xfce and Plasma 5, no wish for Gnome.
I've played with AlienBob's LiveSlak and I like it. Very slick. But I'm still using KDE4 on Slackware64 14.2... in anticipation of 15.0 with Plasma 5 (and now using, as of this past weekend, Xfce on SlackwareARM -current on my shiny new Raspberry Pi 4, with SARPi's help.)
It would be nice if 15.0 came stock with Plasma 5. If 15.0 came just with Qt5/depencies, and that would make Eric willing to keep making Plasma 5 for 15.0 available and updated, that would work just fine for me.
If Eric would make and update Plasma 5 only for -current as long as Qt5/dependencies were included, that would probably motivate me to finally add a partition with -current, or simply switch to it from 14.2.
I guess I would do the same if someone took over making and updating Plasma 5 from Eric, but I would approach that cautiously until I knew I could trust the new person.
@philanc i've used iceweasel, once tried dillo then tried Seamonkey but found it wasn't coping with some requirements. I'm now on 64 bit current and using icecat-60.3.0-x86_64-1_SBo. I can see videos on twitter , watch news BBC on iplayer. But why your probably using iceweasel i'm guessing is that you want something that does the job without unnecessary frills ? certainly thats my thinking
All those years, i am using KDE, Xfce4, Openbox, keep changing between them and Xfce4 had a slight edge as my favourite choice. But now, 99,99% of my time is KDE 5. While offering the expected functionality and flexibilty, it feels as responsive and as light as Xfce4.
Just drop KDE in its entirety on the official branch and allow Eric to maintain a live Plasma 5 version. Retain Xfce as the official DE.
This... I am tempted to create a post with a poll - may or may not be official or even considered by Pat, but I think it would spark an interesting discussion.
No longer than on the next year will be released Qt6, then will forget about the "obsolete" Plasma5 and we will look forward for the brand new and written from scratch Plasma6...
Last edited by ZhaoLin1457; 10-08-2019 at 03:07 PM.
Just drop KDE in its entirety on the official branch and allow Eric to maintain a live Plasma 5 version. Retain Xfce as the official DE.
The sole reason for the existence of my 'ktown' repository with Plasma5 packages (and before that, KDE4 packages) was to provide a testing ground for bleeding edge KDE software. So that the KDE updates in Slackware would be safe because they already had been tested and proofed in the wild.
I have no intention at all of creating and maintaining my own fork of Slackware with a focus on Plasma5. If KDE4 would be dropped from Slackware and Plasma5 would not take its place, the original reason for having 'ktown' is gone. I'd have to reconsider, see also my comment in the KDE poll.
And IMO, XFCE is a nice light-weight Desktop Environment, but that's all it is. It does not play well with HiDPI screens, or multiple screens, and it is just a desktop with no serious applications.
If you remove KDE, there's little left to work with. And if you would want to add modern KDE applications, you would have to install the KDE Frameworks too. Plus all the Qt5 dependencies they require. Plus several of the Plasma packages. This will be un-manageable as a SBo submission.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.