SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhaoLin1457
No longer than on the next year will be released Qt6, then will forget about the "obsolete" Plasma5 and we will look forward for the brand new and written from scratch Plasma6...
And IMO, XFCE is a nice light-weight Desktop Environment, but that's all it is. It does not play well with HiDPI screens, or multiple screens, and it is just a desktop with no serious applications.
I don't know if you'd say the same for Mate, but I am a happy user of Mate 1.22 (I provide also XFCE 4.14 for Slint). It is also and by far the most accessible desktop as of today, which matters a lot for me. Just out of curiosity, which serious applications are available only in or with Plasma?
PS I mean, and have features not found in another software.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 10-08-2019 at 04:05 PM.
I don't know if you'd say the same for Mate, but I am a happy user of Mate 1.22 (I provide also XFCE 4.14 for Slint). It is also and by far the most accessible desktop as of today, which matters a lot for me. Just out of curiosity, which serious applications are available only in or with Plasma?
I like Mate, but I do not use it myself. I provide a Mate Live ISO though and give that a spin from time to time just to see how it evolves.
In KDE Plasma, I can not do without dolphin, kdeconnect, digikam, k3b, kleopatra, kmymoney, konsole, okular, spectacle, and I use a lot of the smaller usability applications on a daily basis.
Also, I use Qt5 oriented applications like VLC, calibre, libreoffice a lot.
In KDE Plasma, I can not do without dolphin, kdeconnect, digikam, k3b, kleopatra, kmymoney, konsole, okular, spectacle, and I use a lot of the smaller usability applications on a daily basis.
Also, I use Qt5 oriented applications like VLC, calibre, libreoffice a lot.
Well, Caja or PCManFM are good enough for me vs dolphin, mate-terminal vs konsole, atril vs okular, to mention those that I know (I don't use GUI for everything). Matter of taste and usage, I assume.
I agree about Qt5, which additionally is becoming more accessible thanks to contributors like Frederik Gladhorn and Chrys.
I would venture that he and Pat share similar points of view about the current state and unnecessary complexity of modern DEs. I imagine what we are seeing here is a tug of war - albeit an amicable one, one would hope - between Pat and Eric, with moving Plasma 5 into Slackware being on one end of the rope and removing KDE altogether being on the other end. If that really is the case I imagine the latter will eventually win out.
Well, that's not the case. Our discussions have been about when, not if.
Distribution: Slackware on server, Bunsenlabs on desktop
Posts: 32
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemfire
....
3) You will create more confusion. Lets be honest many of us on this board have a decade or more experience in the Slackware universe; but given how far the rest of the Linux world has drifted Slackware can be pretty darn alien to new folks. Do you really want them figuring out if they can use that slackbuild/package for 14.2 on their 14.2.3 system?
....
You may just call the ISO slackware64-14.2-20191023, 20191023 being the date of the last patch contained in the ISO
And yes, marketing is important! New users visiting www.slackware.com are seeing 2016-07-01 as the date of the last post
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.