LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
While waddling through the Distributions forums, I was wondering about a number of subforums: Some are dead (like the PrathamOS one), some are "official" but there is (obviously) no representative left (like the Gentoo one). Are the subforums basically "created and left to rot" or does the LQ team actually keep an eye on them?
I'd hate to see old forums deleted if they have valid posts in them. The number of people that use something old because "it just runs" are legion. Taking away posts that might help them with issues should they arise would be bad IMHO.
In my own career I keep detailed notes of everything I do simply because often such things are done once then I have to refer to them maybe 6 months to several years later.
Of course I always urge management to move on to newer things but for some systems it just isn't going to happen as rapidly as technology changes so having old reference sources comes in handy. For the same reason we should urge people questioning older things that it is time to move on but should still try to help them. I still see people asking about RHEL5 which has been EOL for more than a year and RHEL4 (or earlier) that have been EOL even longer. I urge them to move on but also try to answer the question as asked.
It truly annoys me when vendors like HP, Oracle, or others delete old posts and/or downloadable packages just because they no longer offer paid support for a given release and think that everyone magically upgrades to the latest as soon as it is available.
I did not intend to propose removal of no longer supported software. I was just wondering if subforums can "expire" or lose their "official" status here.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
We do archive distribution fora when that distribution becomes unmaintained. The URLs are still accessible and available via search, the forum itself just doesn't appear in the forum list.
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy
We do archive distribution fora when that distribution becomes unmaintained. The URLs are still accessible and available via search, the forum itself just doesn't appear in the forum list.
I think that is the right approach. I agree strongly with MensaWater. Many times it happens that someone has to maintain one or another unknown system. For any valid reason. It is a great help to find old, outdated and obsolete posts for an old, outdated and obsolete system.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.