GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've decided that if a website developer is going to block my browser, then the page wasn't worth seeing anyway.
If they don't want me to see their products, I'll go to a competitor who doesn't have their head up their a$$. I wonder how many businesses would implement this and reduce their market that much, and how long said business would last.
Location: East Coast, USA (in "the great northeast")
Distribution: Custom / from source; Fedora, Debian, CentOS, Scientific; LFS.
Posts: 94
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
Edit: This story has been exploding in the last few days, and taking on the aura of an urban legend. ...
Wow. You're not kidding... Just got 10 pages from google using "whyfirefoxisblocked" as search topic...
What I found to be even more curious was what was returned to me when I opened a connection to "www.jacklewis.net" && retrieved index.html using telnet. Yeah, they're really using that horrible open source software stuff that's so anti-capitallipstick...
Why am I getting the feeling someone was looking for attention?
Code:
telnet www.jacklewis.net 80
Trying 70.87.42.226...
Connected to www.jacklewis.net (70.87.42.226).
Escape character is '^]'.
GET /index.html
<html>
<html>
<title>cPanel®</title>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css">
body {
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12px;
background-color:#367E8E;
scrollbar-base-color: #005B70;
scrollbar-arrow-color: #F3960B;
scrollbar-DarkShadow-Color: #000000;
color: #FFFFFF;
}
a { color:#021f25; text-decoration:none}
h1 {
font-size: 18px;
color: #FB9802;
padding-bottom: 10px;
background-image: url(sys_cpanel/images/bottombody.jpg);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
padding-left: 15px;
}
#body-content p {
padding-left: 25px;
padding-right: 25px;
line-height: 18px;
padding-top: 5px;
padding-bottom: 5px;
}
h2 {
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
color: #FF9900;
padding-left: 15px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="body-content">
<h1>Great Success <i>!</i>
<br />
Apache is working on your cPanel<sup>®</sup> and WHM™ Server</h1>
<p>If you can see this page, then the people who manage this server have installed
<a href="http://www.cpanel.net">cPanel and WebHost Manager (WHM)</a> which use the
<a href="http://www.apache.org/">Apache Web server</a> software and the
<a href="http://www.modssl.org/">Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)</a> successfully.
They now have to add content to this directory and replace this placeholder page, or else
point the server at their real content.</p>
<h2>ATTENTION!</h2>
<p>If you are seeing this page instead of the site you expected, please <strong>contact the
administrator of the site involved.</strong> (Try sending an email to
<samp><webmaster@<em>domain</em>></samp>.) Although this site is running cPanel,
WebHost Manager, and Apache software it almost certainly has no other connection to cPanel Inc.or the Apache Group. Please do not send mail about this site or its contents to cPanel Inc.
or the Apache Group.</p>
<h2>About cPanel:</h2>
<p>cPanel is a leading provider of software for the webhosting industry. If you would like
to learn more about cPanel please visit our website at <a href="http://www.cpanel.net/">www.cpanel.net</a>.
Please be advised that cPanel Inc. is not a web hosting company, and as such has no control over
content found elsewhere on this site.</p>
<h2>About Apache HTTP Server:</h2>
<p>The Apache HTTP Server is an open source web server which powers many of the worlds web sites.
The Apache HTTP server is part of the Apache Group's many influential projects. Their efforts have
helped shape much the world wide web, and they continue to be a dominating force in the web hosting
industry.</p>
</div>
<table width="70%" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="sys_cpanel/images/powered_by.gif" /></td>
<td align="center"><img src="sys_cpanel/images/apache_pb.gif" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- REVISION: 1.3 -->
</BODY>
</HTML>
Connection closed by foreign host.
this guy is just a total wack job. he is greedy and that is that. i called him the day i heard about this, yes you can whois both all of the URLs and find his phone number. i was not rude, or accusing, just asked him to reconsider his stance as a businessman i refuse to deal with the massive amount of security issues posed by most ads out there.
as i spoke with him on the phone, his server crashed. duh i wounder why /sarcasim off
I haven't been to the guys site so I don't know what it is about, nor I actually care about his site. However, if he actually sells stuff at his site, I must say he is brilliant. Think about it: bash a popular browser and get lots of attention. Bingo... you are on every search engine and news and your site will be hit by a vast number of visitors.
Or I could be all wrong and he really is an idiot... Oh well.
Pardon my ignorance, but does that also mean that Opera will be redirected?
Opera seems to work, so apparently it supports the "document.all" JavaScript call. That call is not limited to IE, but IE was the browser that introduced it...before W3C had a standard I think.
and yeah, this guys site is getting way more traffic than it deserves because of this
I haven't been to the guys site so I don't know what it is about, nor I actually care about his site. However, if he actually sells stuff at his site, I must say he is brilliant. Think about it: bash a popular browser and get lots of attention. Bingo... you are on every search engine and news and your site will be hit by a vast number of visitors.
Or I could be all wrong and he really is an idiot... Oh well.
Read the content of his site (try Opera) and you'll see he's just an idiot (or a joke).
That said, the guy's an idiot. He's just looking at the browser agent thingy. And we all know it's easy to change. On top of that, no one is redirecting to his site...
>> "Opera seems to work, so apparently it supports the "document.all" JavaScript call. That call is not limited to IE, but IE was the browser that introduced it... before W3C had a standard I think."
is that link safe to click on ... do i need to enable javascript and the rest ... ??
//seems like an interesting issue after reading this thread a bit ...
//seems like an interesting issue after reading this thread a bit ...
I think it's stupid.
I pay for my bandwidth. If someone wants to force me to use my bandwidth to download ads, then they can re-imburse me for the privilege.
By comparison, while I have the option to pay for TV content, I choose not to. I watch free-to-air TV and accept the fact that it will be full of annoying advertisements, because someone has to pay the bills.
I could be more sympathetic to his cause if I didn't have to pay for my bandwidth, but I do, so I aren't...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.