GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I get a blank page here because I got Adblock plus installed on my Firefox. However I read the content in the Page Source. It goes like
Quote:
You've reached this page because the site you were trying to visit now blocks the FireFox browser.
The Mozilla Foundation and its Commercial arm, the Mozilla Corporation, has allowed and endorsed AdBlock Plus, a plug-in that blocks advertisement on web sites and also prevents site owners from blocking people using it. Software that blocks all advertisement is an infringement of the rights of web site owners and developers. Numerous web sites exist in order to provide quality content in exchange for displaying ads. Accessing the content while blocking the ads, therefore would be no less than stealing.
Millions of hard working people are being robbed of their time and effort by this type of software. Many site owners therefore install scripts that prevent people using ad blocking software from accessing their site. That is their right as the site owner to insist that the use of their resources accompanies the presence of the ads...
I don't agree with anything it says, ....well screw it!!
I was under the impression Firefox only blocks the obtrusive popups that open without user interaction...I've never had regular advertisements blocked. I'm sure M$ is going to help support a legal battle against Mozilla over this issue, should be interesting to see how it goes. Guess its time for an addon that makes Firefox appear to be IE to web servers.
I get a blank page here because I got Adblock plus installed on my Firefox. However I read the content in the Page Source. It goes like
I don't agree with anything it says, ....well screw it!!
Just for grins, have you tried changing your user agent settings and seeing if the site will work that way? Personally, I probably would just avoid the site as well, but I've had some success with User Agent Switcher for those sites that aren't specifically BLOCKING Firefox, but are designed to work "only with IE"...
The extension AdBlockPlus blocks "inline" ads. Since there is no way to detect whether a user has this extension installed they have decide to ban all firefox users.
Thing is, a lot of these "unobtrusive" adverts are distracting, annoying and waste screen real-estate and bandwidth, especially the flash ones.
I cannot possibly comprehend the kind of logic that goes into this sort of message. It would be analogous to forbidding people who have radio receivers that can change reception frequency (yeah, that's all of them) from listening to your radio station because they might switch away during a commercial break.
Following their pin-headed logic, they should also block IE because Windows users could run Norton Internet Security, which has a popup and ad blocker in it. Damn those IE users for ripping the bread from my children's mouths!
That is their right as the site owner to insist that the use of their resources accompanies the presence of the ads
It certainly is their right to block whomever they want, just as it is your (global 'your' here) right to ignore their site and not buy any products or services from them.
I get a blank page here because I got Adblock plus installed on my Firefox.
There is something a bit flaky about your accusation. When I go there, the page is not blank, it simply states the information, you supposedly pulled from the page source. It is not a redirection by some one concerned about you not seeing their ads.
I would be a lot more annoyed if I actually encountered a site that was redirecting me there. As far as I can tell, no one actually uses this page. Someone may well be trying to sell this service, but I don't believe it is currently an issue.
No, of course not. It isn't a re-direction but just somebody trying to prove something to someone. The scenario would be worrisome if the more reputable ones start doing such things because of the things mentioned there.
Edit: And yes, if I disable Adblock plus, I can view the contents as well but the page is a blank white when enabled.
Last edited by Hitboxx; 08-18-2007 at 09:25 PM.
Reason: Tested the same Again
It is a redirect, try www.jacklewis.net with FF and you'll be redirected to whyfirefoxisblocked.
Yeah. Well I tried jacklewis.net in Konqueror, which should have worked, and it redirected me to whyfirefoxisblocked as well. Obviously, that is a hard redirect ... There is, evidently, no real jacklewis.net page, let alone one that wants you to see their ads.
Edit: This story has been exploding in the last few days, and taking on the aura of an urban legend. I just googled around a little bit to see if anyone else was of the opinion that it was a baseless bit of foolishness. Google rather quickly turns up this piece of reason amongst all the hysteria.
Last edited by rickh; 08-18-2007 at 10:32 PM.
Reason: Additional info
Yeah. Well I tried jacklewis.net in Konqueror, which should have worked, and it redirected me to whyfirefoxisblocked as well. Obviously, that is a hard redirect ... There is, evidently, no real jacklewis.net page, let alone one that wants you to see their ads.
Edit: This story has been exploding in the last few days, and taking on the aura of an urban legend. I just googled around a little bit to see if anyone else was of the opinion that it was a baseless bit of foolishness. Google rather quickly turns up this piece of reason amongst all the hysteria.
...so you tested it with Konqueror and assumed its a lie? I just visited jacklewis.net in IE and it is very real.
edit: www.whatsmyinfo.com shows "Mozilla" in the browser info for Konqueror, could explain why its blocked as well
edit: Took another look at this page and found they are redirecting with the following:
wow, thats one way to do it, use IE's poor JavaScript implementation as a way to know if people are using a better browser...
So this idiot isn't even testing to see if your browser is Firefox. He's only testing to see if it's IE. Anything else gets redirected. Not only is he misguided and greedy, but he's a pretty piss poor excuse for a web developer too.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.