Too Little, Too Late? - NY Times Finally Pulls Out the All the Stops on Climate Change
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Human Caused Climate Change is Real?
Because some think it is completely impossible to divorce the question of this poll from politics, and many of those assume that human caused climate change is not only a hoax but essentially a tool for a Socialist takeover, at least in the US, I thought I 'd post a link to an interesting political/economic converstaion.
In this Draft Environmental Impact Statement, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration outlines why freezing fuel-efficiency rules for cars and light trucks for six years will do little to avert a global temperature rise of roughly 7 degrees Fahrenheit or 4 degrees Celsius by 2100.
Sweet-looking ride; like cranking up the volume on a high-end stereo system—voom!
Some technology moves real fast and some like plants soaking up the rays don't... free trade has had nothing to do with progress that's an excuse if you ask me.
Like when the argument came up in the religious megathread about how much music* religion has brought to us. It still would be there without religion in fact drugs has brought us more music and ironically religions?
Reality is not open to interpretation but we don't care!
Last edited by jamison20000e; 01-09-2019 at 12:50 AM.
How does anyone know what "reality" is without interpretation?
Orson Welles' infamous 1938 "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast caused so many problems because people failed to interpret it as fiction. Conversely, some people today fail to interpret the dangers of opioids as reality, causing themselves and other great harm.
While this is flirting with Off Topic it does apply since it is discussing the difference between Reality and Perception. There is a valid reason why Plato and Aristotle view reality very differently but yet both having a glimpse of the same Reality. WE only perceive the world with five very limited senses which implies interpretation but just as a Black and White movie still tells us a story we understand about a colorful world,we can deduce the Big Picture pretty accurately but at the same time our senses can be deceived... even willfully twisted and spun around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moody Blues
Breathe deep the gathering gloom
Watch lights fade from every room
Bedsitter people look back and lament
Another days useless energies spent
Empassioned lovers wrestle as one
Lonely man cries for love and has none
New mother picks up and settles her son
Senior citizens wish they were young
Cold hearted orb that rules the night
Removes the colors from our sight
Red is gray and yellow white
But we decide which is right
And which is an illusion
While subjectively this is true, objectively we can be wrong... even dead wrong.
WE only perceive the world with five very limited senses ...
If I may follow in your subthread of questionable topicality, are you sure we only have five? What about our sense of balance? Isn't it a separate sense? What about our ability to sense the ambient temperature? Isn't that different than touch?
If I may follow in your subthread of questionable topicality, are you sure we only have five? What about our sense of balance? Isn't it a separate sense? What about our ability to sense the ambient temperature? Isn't that different than touch?
Congratulations, you caught me in a gross generalization I made in the interest of brevity and remaining focused on the "limited" modifier part. I didn't really want to get into just how limited not only the ranges of our senses but our ability to make sense out any perception but it is an awfully good point that furthers the concept that interpretation is a given, but all living beings do rather well within those limitations or they wouldn't be still living.
Regarding the music my tastes are wider than anyone I know. I lost an audio collection that weighed well over a metric ton in a tragic accident.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.