GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Surprising we are still using many formats that lock the user to the use of given software. If you use a specific software for a document, worst would be proprietary closed software, then you will end up in being dependent to this software.
I think that we should promote and try as good a possible plain text, for documents.
TeX or LaTeX is a good example of markup language, which gives the user almost complete freedom.
Any editor such as nano, vim, emacs,... can do the visual thing, or programmed applications can easily read or reformat it.
It depends on what the document is prepared for and the type of information it contains.
TeX may be fine for preparing documents that are going to be printed, but not everything is. Nor can everyone accept it: none of the articles I've had published were acceptable in TeX markup. Its use is largely confined to scientists and mathematicians, and I recently read an article that showed it was neither faster nor more reliable for maths than a modern word-processor.
Plain text obviously places considerable restrictions on the use of tables and precludes diagrams. Few of the research notes on this computer would be readable or even usable in plain text. Plain text is for programmers, not scholars.
I have been working on computers since the early 1960s, and some of the machines had disk files dating to the late 1950s. As far as I can tell, the only file format from those days that survives to the present is simple ASCII text. There were (are) end-of-record issues, but you could always throw the files up on a primitive terminal to see what they contained. I occasionally was able to retrieve useful (compilable) code -- invariably, Fortran -- from that ancient stuff.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.