GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by carl0ski point taken i never really thought of MAC address and Macintosh being ever confused i still donīt
But at the end of the day the IT industry has run out of 3 Letter Acronyms and is starting to reuse them using varied cases
theres a new product with the acronym DDr
I heard about the Mac Mini waiting eagerly hoping it will be in Australia by March for me to buy myself for christmas,
Technichally, Mac is not an acronym but an abbreviation; it's just short for Macintosh. In an acronym, each letter stands for something. I can't verify this, but judging by Apple's Australian website the Mac mini is already available there for a price of AU$799 and an estimated build time of 2-3 weeks.
there are very few annoyances on os x gui. in fact i only have 1: finder doesnīt do sftp (get fugu for that). well, maybe apple will correct that in tiger, finally. i donīt know.
btw, has anyone any experience with tigerīs new cluster stuff (XGrid)? it looks...hmm...interesting. http://www.apple.com/acg/xgrid/
Originally posted by macskeeball Technichally, Mac is not an acronym but an abbreviation; it's just short for Macintosh. In an acronym, each letter stands for something
There you go at it again
Quote:
I can't verify this, but judging by Apple's Australian website the Mac mini is already available there for a price of AU$799 and an estimated build time of 2-3 weeks.
hell with that i not paying that much I was expecting it be approx $680-$700
"Imagine waking up one day to find your Mac has solved a vexing scientific problem. While the cure to cancer, super-efficient solar power and ending world hunger are a ways off, you can combine your computing resources using Xgrid and help usher in a new era of biological breakthroughs, rocket science and advanced models of scientific phenomena."
maybe apple created a cluster to spew out bullshit.
I always find the OS Wars somewhat amusing and yet..disturbing. Different Operating Systems work for different people/systems for different reasons. Use what works for you.
its still funny to think that some dweeb gets "empowered" by apples propaganda.
ooh, im going to go spend 20000 dollars on xsevers and when i get home im going to find a cure for cancer. YAY!
All they're talking about is Folding@Home, the multi-platform distributed computing project created by Stanford for conducting research on how proteins fold through simulation. The data obtained from the simulations helps medical scientists inn search of cures to Alzheimer's, Mad Cow disease, and many cancers.
Originally posted by macskeeball All they're talking about is Folding@Home, the multi-platform distributed computing project created by Stanford for conducting research on how proteins fold through simulation. The data obtained from the simulations helps medical scientists inn search of cures to Alzheimer's, Mad Cow disease, and many cancers.
its a much better use of cpu cycles than seti@home. i tried the protein folding thing a while ago on my windows computer.
Originally posted by pevelius btw, has anyone any experience with tigerīs new cluster stuff (XGrid)? it looks...hmm...interesting. http://www.apple.com/acg/xgrid/
From my experience, it's pretty unstable still. We've been using Sun Grid Engine on our xserve cluster instead. Ironically we do cancer research on our cluster, so nuka_t your comment is highly applicable (though you need to multiply the price tag by about 20x)
Originally posted by nuka_t i just went to dell.com and customized an xps. it comes with xp home, but you can put linux on it, obviously.
just look at htese numbers. amazing. the only number lower on the dell than on a pb is the price, and thats before a 250 dollare rebate.
dell xps - pb 15" superdrive
price 2750 - 250 -75=2425 - 2500
intel pentium 4 3.4 ghz with HT technology - 1.5ghz g4 (megahurtz myth or not, it just got pwnd)
512mb ddr 400 ram - 512mb ddr 333 ram
256mb mobility radeon 9800(no, thats not a typo) - 64mb radeon 9700(its not really a 9700, its actually a 9600 on steriods. it dosent have 256bit memory like the desktop 9700 pro)
60 gig hdd - 80 gig hdd, meh
4x dvd rw removable - 4x dvdrw stationary
1920x1200 resolution - 1280x854 res
external USB audigy 2nx surround sound - headphone jack
dell 720 color printer - who needs a printer?
as you can see, first rate pwnage, no matter how you look at it.
Apple Laptops are defintely long in the tooth -- they are basically 3-5 year old technology - even the battery life isn't state of the art -- though it is bad to compare that to the Dell XPS while a screamer of a Laptop [possibly the fastest mainstream laptop money can buy] only has mediocre battery life. From the Dell website, the XPS laptop is about $4k. Between the two laptops, I think I would go for longer battery life and go with a Dell Laptop such as the 8600 (One I own already and wanted more than 45 minutes of battery life) and stick to my consoles (XBOX and PS2) for games.
On desktops, it is better to compare the PowerPC dual G5 2.5GHz + nVidia 6800 Ultra with similar specs to the Dell XPS similarly equipped. The XPS will still outshine the Mac on games (slightly), but the Mac will hold its own on floating point and image processing such as for video, or pictures. Not too shabby for a 1 year old design. Since half of my family income depends upon graphics, we have a dual 2GHz G5 and for a lot of non game tasks this is a great machine and cost a similar amount to a similarly speced PC, though if you put a lightweight OS on it like a properly specced Linux, it will blow the doors off of the Mac.
I would agree there is more reason to run Linux on the PC based computer than a Mac, though I don't think that Mac's are all that bad. I own something running both major OS's -- and am getting my feet wet with Linux. My first project is to install Linux on an old Powerbook G3 laptop I am repairing after the Lithium battery and main battery wore down! [problem with the Powerbook Pismo's]
my 17" pb has: 4hrs of battery life (i can watch 2 movies, it lasts at least 2 weeks if sleeping all the time), zero configuration wlan g, bluetooth (that works every time), all additional equipment works out of the box, fw800, 10/100/1000 ethernet, ambient light sensor (it adjusts the backlight and does it very nicely), sleep works every time (wakes up with wlan in 2 secs), flawless tv-out with itīs own icc-profile-option, thinnest design there is, pc-card slot, no external nipples that get stuck, quite good speakers for a laptop, smallest power adapter ever, low power consuption (and thus it is absolutely silent), now, for intensive calculations and total freedom from commercial software the dell is better. or any 2Ghz x86. but for overall fuctionality...iīd choose os x and my hardware any day. oh, i almost forgot: it has bash, X11, and if you install fink or gentoo for os x you can choose from thousends of oss the ones you like and install them with one command (or like with synaptic if you use fink commander: pre-compiled of from source). i really cannot see why some people donīt tolerate apple hardware/software. politics towards a stupid company is one thing, but come on. products are still great.
gotta standardize, and obviously this is not an AppleQuestions.org site...
So what do you think! Linux Server, Linux Business Desktop, OSX for Fun!.. thats my final answer! Life is to short to not have an iPod, iPhoto, iMovie, Motion, Lightwave, etc... ATBMS
So, I really Love my PowerBook! I kinda tripped out there for a few when I got it... I loved it so much I started buying Apple... I bought 10 eMacs, 3 iMacs, and 5 PowerBooks... for the Business. Luckily I put them all in Creative Departments... they all thanked me up and down, and since then they have all purchased Apple for there Home... Apple Laptops are Smokin!! Im sticking with those for all Laptops though.. And my IT have both, either an iMac or Powerbook, and a Linux Tower!!
I actually went a little crazy, as I had been testing SuSE 9.0 Pro, on the Desktop and was having som issues.. I was thinking of how I could use Apple... But then 9.1 and 9.2 arrived, and viola! I came to my senses... and swiftly rolled it out... I'm about 70% Linux on the Desktop (250 total), and OpenOffice is everywhere!!! except the Apples I use Neo Office. (same thing)
I use all Linux Servers!!! Although the XServe is sooooooo tempting...
I want one!!! So Bad...
Wait, I'm back... just went a little crazy again! hehehe
Tough call! man... They both Rock! depending on what your doing... and who you are...
Im a crazy, freaky, Punk Rock, CTO... with 19 locations. apple servers, naw. ain't gonna work, for me. gotta standardize, distribute, and keep it simple.
So what do you think! Business is Linux! Play & create on OSX!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.