What features/changes would you like to see in future Slackware?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I vaguely recall once upon a time submitting the idea to Pat. I could try again.
Sounds great
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsman
Thanks for noticing.
The Zenwalk people adopted the idea after I wrote about my experiences with release 4.4.1.
The way I have the scripts colorized is easily disabled by editing one line in a config file. Some people could care less about colorized scripts and disabling is necessary. Some additional work is needed, however. Currently my color scheme works great with a black background only. Some people prefer white or transparent xterms. The config file should contain alternate color schemes for such people. I probably could add the Zenwalk color scheme for transparent xterms, which is what the Zenwalk folks use.
VectorLinux also has their own version which is similar. I do like their use of the "echoc" command which takes a second arg for the color of the text to display. That function could use the switch to determine if colors are used and if so, which color configuration.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Thanks to AlienBob it's already there but you just have to feed some info at the boot prompt.
........
Again it's mostly there but you just have to either edit the initrd yourself or be there to give the parameters... we can't do this as everyones needs are different.
Yes, it is mostly there. Manually entering boot parameters is too complicated and it is also necessary to manually install the key to have a secure shell from the very start, so it is either modifying initrd, or Slax, or whatever. For me and for now it is sufficient to know that this is not hard to do.
The idea was to allow for completely unattended remotely controlled installation out of the box, that is, without burning new installation media, just adding some additional one.
When originally posting, I thought no distro does that. Now, after trying to formulate the idea better, I see that Slax does exactly that. Email somebody the changes file and the link to download the standard Slax - and you are all set to create a remotely managed server, Slackware or not.
Thus, what I wanted was actually the Slax "changes file" feature implemented with the Slackware installer. This would help everyone who wants to modify initrd in any way (just not having to burn any media is good) but with Slax already existing I agree this is not worth the effort.
I don't know if theres a reason for grub legacy to still be in /extra when grub2 is available, also i'd love to see slackware move from lilo to grub. I use grub because of the command line option that lilo doesnt offer and because it can boot kernels from any partition not just the root partition.
i couldnt get grubconfig in the package because it doesnt seem to like the fact that there's no /usr/sbin/grub. And I'm not sure if its just my computer or if the package could use recompiling somehow but grub-install took 10-15 min and the update-grub took 30 min.
Master Build Script
That topic got left too soon. That is a great idea.
You definitely need to document the dependencies though. Somebody is doing something to that nature now.
There has to be a build plan written down somewhere. Perhaps they even have a script.
Maybe the inner circle has a copy of this.
I know I have notes written down for building glibc, gcc, and Xorg.
Possible reasons for a master build script:
1. Automate a recompile for your architecture (Xeon / i686 / 64 bit)
2. Package up your build of the system for your home network.
Master Build Script
That topic got left too soon. That is a great idea.
You definitely need to document the dependencies though. Somebody is doing something to that nature now.
There has to be a build plan written down somewhere. Perhaps they even have a script.
Maybe the inner circle has a copy of this.
I know I have notes written down for building glibc, gcc, and Xorg.
Possible reasons for a master build script:
1. Automate a recompile for your architecture (Xeon / i686 / 64 bit)
2. Package up your build of the system for your home network.
List could grow.
The build script is a very bad idea, in maintainance terms.
An example is the latest GCC 4.3 update in current.
I bet many packages in Slackware dont build with that version of GCC.
Providing patches just for that is a waste of time.
Slackware is a 100% binary distribution.
Noone is preventing you from doing all that yourself.
Documenting dependencies doesnt even require scripting skills.
I say go for it. If you lead the way maybe others who feel the same as you will follow.
That's a bit like telling somebody to leave a message on your answering machine.
So another wish for Slackware 13 is to have a bug report page, similar to Debian's / Fedora for example.
This would allow for the creation of a proper procedure.
Task could be assigned, you'd have more visibility of the problem.
* Bug Kde KSnapshot Segfault
* Status --//-- Assigned to AlienBob
* State --//-- InProc
--------------
Fowarded to KDE Dev for review
L 8 R
I used to feel the same about this too until some point.
I had even asked Alien Bob in the IRC once about it. This involves a more open development. Not gonna happen any time soon.
FWIW with the size of Slackware i no longer think there is a need for a bug tracker. As others have pointed out, LQ and info@slackware.com is adecuate.
Your example with KDE sucks, because KDE has a bug tracker. Whats the use in letting Alien Bob know about it? Its a waste of his time..
Hes just a Slackware packager, not a KDE developer.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.