LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-20-2003, 08:23 AM   #1
rudor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austria
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy PCMCIA-Troubles


Hi, im an experienced user, but complety new to linux so please forgive me, if this error is a bummer.

I took my old Acer Travelmate 512 and put Redhat 9.0 Linux on it, to play around and have some Python programs running.

Thats the plan.

The problem:
Redhat Linux 9.0
AcerTravelmate 512T
Surecom EP 428x/Realtek PCMCIA Network-Card

On Startup of Linux, the systems reports the Networkcard missing

8139too-> device seems to be missing, initializing delayed

(thats translated from the german error message)

Now the strange thing: the networkcard shows in the GNOME Network-Menu, as deactivated. When i activate it, it works! Now as i activated it, it already starts, when i call the network-menu, which seems to init the card.

But i dont want to call the network-menu every time i start my linux, so how do i get it to work on startup?

And: I dont want to use GNOME on the long term either, because its even slower than MS Windows on that old fellow, so how do i get it to work in command-line modus?
 
Old 10-20-2003, 11:32 AM   #2
tcaptain
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal
Distribution: Gentoo 2004 from stage 1 baby!
Posts: 1,403

Rep: Reputation: 45
My first guess would be to check that PCMCIA is started BEFORE network.

(I have that problem in Mandrake...had to fix it manually).

Check in the /etc/rc.d directories for whatever runlevel you use.
 
Old 10-21-2003, 03:12 AM   #3
rudor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austria
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs up the solution

To all experts and to tcaptain:

Thanx! It worked! Spect!

To all newbies like me:

Linux seems to have a Runlevel, like the gears in a car. To find out which files you need to change, you first have to find out your runlevel. I tried the Terminal, and typed "runlevel" and it worked, at least i got "R 5" or something, i guessed that means my Redhat is running on Level 5. (This depends on Linux Distribution)

Knowing my runlevel, going to the " /etc/rc.d" directory meant for me to go to "/etc/rc5.d". There are a lot of files, some start with S01 some with K01.

To know what to do, i restarted my linux, on booting i pressed "I" which forced Red Hat to start in interactive mode, telling me all the files it boots. I wrote them down.

Later it showed that the files with S-Numbers seems to be some system stuff, an my filelist was represented by the K-Files. My network was File K08network and PCMCIA K24pcmcia. So i renamed K07iptables to K06iptables to have some room(which only worked in GNOME; i tried to rename it in the terminal and nothing happened). Then i renamed K24pcmcia -> K07pcmcia. Now pcmcia is loaded before the network.

Reboot -> Done! It Worked, Yippiee!

PS: ok, im approaching Linux like its an alien artefact, but i like it
 
Old 10-21-2003, 11:34 AM   #4
tcaptain
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal
Distribution: Gentoo 2004 from stage 1 baby!
Posts: 1,403

Rep: Reputation: 45
just a note:

The K* links are links to KILL a certain process (ie: K08network is Kill network, but its the 8th service to be killed when the signal goes) and the S* are links to start the process.

So if you rename your S* links like you did your K* links, you won't have to use Interactive mode to boot.
 
Old 10-22-2003, 03:42 AM   #5
rudor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austria
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
K* and S*

Hmmm,

but i actually just changed the K* order in Runlevel 5 and it worked?

This doesnt make sense then, if its just for Killing Processes, if it dont get it wrong...

ok maybe i just have forgotten it, and actually changed the S* numbers... but good to know

does the Kill-Sequence make any difference?
 
Old 10-22-2003, 08:45 AM   #6
tcaptain
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal
Distribution: Gentoo 2004 from stage 1 baby!
Posts: 1,403

Rep: Reputation: 45
The kill sequence MIGHT make a difference in certain things, but I've never changed it personally and never run into it...so I couldn't tell you any specifics. I only say it might because logically, if one service depends on another that gets killed first then errors might crop up in theory if you think about it that way
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RH ent. 9 WS pcmcia troubles pyromaniac9069 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 02-26-2004 08:37 PM
For those with PCMCIA troubles with 2.6.0 -- Shade Linux - Laptop and Netbook 0 12-20-2003 12:47 AM
Pcmcia nic troubles Glooba Linux - Networking 2 08-24-2003 04:58 PM
pcmcia troubles spux Linux - Newbie 0 03-06-2003 03:30 AM
PCMCIA Troubles dj_mako Linux - Newbie 7 01-13-2002 04:43 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration