GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I was referring to the trend of M$ forcing Acer, ASUS, and Dell to drop Linux on netbooks that Google is reversing. Not the trend of the "desktop monopoly vs. cloud monopoly" bit.
I mean Dell always offers older software. Even with Windows 7 out for quite a while, they kept Windows XP as the standard for most their PC's until Microsoft pulled the plug.
And for those who don't have their head burred in the sand it is called more of the exterminate practices MS uses. But hey if it makes you able to sleep at night don't let me burst your bubble.
When you have to sell something below market value to keep your product in the hands of the public it is called desperation. MS wants the entire market, unlike Ma Bell back when that just had the entire market. Microsoft does not want to allow any other OS to get into the public hands and to this end they try to exterminate anything that gets in their way to keep things the way they are. Clear to the point of selling their product at a loss and even saying it is okay that there is so much piracy of Windows in other countries. Like I said before, MS was given their place in the market by IBM.. handed to then on a silver platter. MS never learned how to compete morally with others, they are like a little bully that wants to keep their place so bad that they go around and beat up on everything in site. FOr example, MS never needed Internet Explorer.. they never made a dime off it but since they had the product they had to kill anything else that offered one. So, even though MS never made a dime off IE, they kept Netscape in court till they were bankrupt. Why? It surely was not about the money as like I said.. MS has never made a dime off of IE.
Microsoft is a business...
Honestly, what do you expect a business to want to do?
Well if it were up to Kenny, Microsoft should just cease to exist .
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopard
And Internet Explorer... it's Microsoft's OS.
IE is a browser, not an OS though it is 'technically' part of the OS since it is integrated into Windows. Though in the EU you can get a copy of Windows that doesn't have IE integrated; and you actually have the option to not install it.
in the EU you can get a copy of Windows that doesn't have IE integrated; and you actually have the option to not install it.
Actually, I think that version still uses the IE core for the desktop/file browser...it's just that it doesn't automatically install the web browser frontend components.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.