GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: LMDE/Peppermint/Mint 9,&10/along with a few others
Posts: 152
Rep:
@Kenny
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn
What? Isn't Linux free in most cases? If you download a Linux distro (like Ubuntu) and burn it to a single CD or DVD, you can install it all 5 (or an unlimited number more) of computers.
You can even copy the disk and give it to friends without any hassle. This, and you can even customize the image to be able to install software in it (as well as change settings) [remaster the Live CD or DVD] without any lawyers attacking you.
So how could there be a "cost" of Linux?
The cost was purchasing a few discs for different distros AND a couple of USB flash drives that I use to introduce friends to Linux when they ask.
What? Isn't Linux free in most cases? If you download a Linux distro (like Ubuntu) and burn it to a single CD or DVD, you can install it all 5 (or an unlimited number more) of computers.
You can even copy the disk and give it to friends without any hassle. This, and you can even customize the image to be able to install software in it (as well as change settings) [remaster the Live CD or DVD] without any lawyers attacking you.
So how could there be a "cost" of Linux?
Assuming you mean business, there is quite a bit of cost. Training, IT, setup, support, etc.
Most business aren't going to change their workstations over to Linux exactly for that reason.
The cost was purchasing a few discs for different distros AND a couple of USB flash drives that I use to introduce friends to Linux when they ask.
Can't you just burn those discs from .ISO images?
Sure, I agree slightly with the USB flash drives, but don't they have USB drives of their own that you could just give CDs to? The CDs (if you have Ubuntu or Fedora) have GUI tools on them that you can use to create Live USB drives.
Don't forget other overhead loads for the business. There's more than just the cost of the media. Someone who has never been in business would not understand the cost justifications for any operation(s) within the business. GNU/Linux might seem free to some but when it is used for a business there are a lot of hidden cost or load on the operation. This same cost is for any operation within the business for normal and add load for the additional performance. If your employees are not trained there is cost for training. Error offset for entry error or miscalculation for re-entry operations. If the admin is the owner/operator then the time cost for maintenance operations and other general operations.
There will be hidden costs for any operation. Loads of hidden costs that must be justified whether your using a GNU/Linux or M$.
Umm, no...I prefer to be able to do things other than browse the web, TYVM. Why replace a desktop monopoly with a "cloud" monopoly? To me that actually makes the situation worse...
I was referring to the trend of M$ forcing Acer, ASUS, and Dell to drop Linux on netbooks that Google is reversing. Not the trend of the "desktop monopoly vs. cloud monopoly" bit.
Linux was doing very well on the original Asus EEEpc and M$ saw how well the netbook was selling and decided to convinced Asus to put window$ on it because it would sell more units.
Micro$oft doesn't give linux or any other operating system a chance to thrive.
When M$ sees something good, they don't want a piece -- they want the whole pie.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.