LXer: Torvalds says he has no strong opinions on systemd
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
LXer: Torvalds says he has no strong opinions on systemd
Published at LXer:
Linux creator Linus Torvalds is well-known for his strong opinions on many technical things. But when it comes to systemd, the init system that has caused a fair degree of angst in the Linux world, Torvalds is neutral.
And systemd is in no way the piece that breaks with old UNIX legacy. Graphical applications seldom worked that way (there are certainly _echoes_ of it in things like "LyX", but I think it's the exception rather than the rule), and then there's obviously the traditional counter-example of GNU emacs, where it really was not about the "simple UNIX model", but a whole new big infrastructure thing. Like systemd.
Now, I'm still old-fashioned enough that I like my log-files in text, not binary, so I think sometimes systemd hasn't necessarily had the best of taste, but hey, details..
So basically systemd is the new emacs ?
The devil is in the details.
I am surprised that Linus doesn't have a strong opinion as usual (I was hoping he would), maybe he'll get one later if the systemd devs manage to piss him off enough ? I would think at least the move to binary would have caused some opinion ...
I guess I'll just have to wait and see where things go. I have already made my mind up that systemd is not for me. I will use alternatives as long as they are available and when they stop being available or possible (I can't hack something up myself even) then it's time to look to the BSDs.
Linus Torvald's opinion doesn't carry much weight anymore. In fact, it looks as though Pottering has more sway in regards to "Linux" than LT does as LP seems to be getting his way quite a bit.
In short; If Linus said that systemd was shit, I doubt anything would change. So this article is fluff Imo.
Last edited by szboardstretcher; 09-15-2014 at 02:50 PM.
Meh. Linux is currently a free product. Anyone can become big in the community and have supporters and detractors, *especially when you are employed by one of the biggest Linux companies in the world.
I think it's funny that we used to hate Bill Gates, and now that pulseaudiod/gnomed/systemd has arrived, we(some of us) hate one of our own.
That is unfortunate because I don't like this Pottering guy.
Are you suspicious that this Pottering guy could have the power and authority (because of his connections) to make a mess of things using or manipulating systemd?
Are you suspicious that this Pottering guy could have the power and authority (because of his connections) to make a mess of things using or manipulating systemd?
He is already doing it, and he is unlikely to stop doing it. I might even bet at one point he'll want to change "Linux" to "Potterinx".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.