What features/changes would you like to see in future Slackware?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The website could be given a makeover and made to continue looking good in text-only browsers simultaneously. Just takes some thought into how the markup is going to be structured. What I'd like to see on the site side though, is less the look of the thing - but things like:
+ Maybe more focus on "community" as well as "support". I am also in support of trying to centralise and bring knowledge together into say one wiki, one bugzilla, one forum (I'm perfectly willing to discuss exactly what is possible, perhaps we're too diverse to do that, but I think the "official" stamp just gives a much better idea that Slack is alive and well).
+ RSS feeds for the changelog, yes, I'm lame enough to have one open in a tab of my web browser most of the time - but having it in akregator would be much nicer.
+ A bit more news, even if it's just "the -current tree has re-opened! test test test" and the like. I've seen blog suggestions, but I'm not sure Pat would be keen on that, he's already unhappy that the changelog is getting bloggy
NetworkManager interests me, and I can definitely see the desire for a grub installer some day. Lilo works for me at the moment now, so it's just something I think the distro might benefit from rather than me specifically.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
CSS here and there may be good, however, I think that a lot people tends to mixes the outside with the inside of things, and how those are related, let me explain...
I sold you a car, it's a beauty, shinny, marvelous, flashy, fancy, you just looked the outside and already you want to buy it, but the inside is another history, the engine is used, lacks of performance, it will stops everytime you try to use the car.....will you buy it? no, you won't, and worst, you'll tell everyone you know that the car doesn't work.
My point with this is that not just because looks good for the outside will be good inside, Slackware is a beauty inside, and like the distro, "the home page just works", it serves its purpose...
Yes, by nature, humans tends to see first the outside, and do things based on that, but in the ends is just silly, slackware "sells" it self by being a rock solid distro that works, not by having a fancy web page, in a proper sense, with a shinny page, you'll be selling...the page.
If it ain't broken, don't fixed it.
Regards
Yes, alas, it's completely the other way round with Slackware: It *is* a beauty inside, eg. it now has D-BUS and HAL and UDEV, and all three work together so nicely as in hardly any other distribution. Which means that Slackware 12.0 scores high in end-user friendliness, finally! And that without giving up the least bit of what makes it so strong on servers. But the outside appearance is bound to chase away potential users... Which is a pity.
By saying the web site could use a little shape-up, I don't mean I want to see more show and less content. I am sure, however, that it could look a little more appealing, and still keep its unique style and its underlying KISS principle. Navigation is good, no doubt, so don't change that significantly. And the result doesn't have to look as fashionable as the Sabayon Linux website.
Regarding the "Slackware mindset": That's chicken and egg, I guess. Currently people might turn away after seeing the website, before they even know that they have got that mindset.
Hmm. Not to spoil all my arguments, but: As a matter of fact, I didn't find Slackware. It found me.
Am I the only one, who thinks, that people, who know, what they want, find Slackware themselves? Pretty webpage is not important for them. I'm satisfied with Slackware webpage, because it lets you access information as comfortably as possible (Sabayon page probably makes people nervous). And Slackware design is one the best designs I have seen yet (the other being http://ircd-hybrid.com/).
Am I the only one, who thinks, that people, who know, what they want, find Slackware themselves? Pretty webpage is not important for them. I'm satisfied with Slackware webpage, because it lets you access information as comfortably as possible (Sabayon page probably makes people nervous). And Slackware design is one the best designs I have seen yet (the other being http://ircd-hybrid.com/).
Agreed. The Slackware site works for me; I can easily access the information and software that I need.
Probably most people learn about Slackware from word of mouth or forum rather than looking at different Linux distro web sites. However, as previously mentioned, centralizing some of the knowledge to the website would be very good.
Am I the only one, who thinks, that people, who know, what they want, find Slackware themselves? Pretty webpage is not important for them. I'm satisfied with Slackware webpage, because it lets you access information as comfortably as possible (Sabayon page probably makes people nervous). And Slackware design is one the best designs I have seen yet (the other being http://ircd-hybrid.com/).
Indeed...the page does what it was designed to, the way it should be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gargamel
...But the outside appearance is bound to chase away potential users... Which is a pity.
By saying the web site could use a little shape-up, I don't mean I want to see more show and less content. I am sure, however, that it could look a little more appealing, and still keep its unique style and its underlying KISS principle. Navigation is good, no doubt, so don't change that significantly. And the result doesn't have to look as fashionable as the Sabayon Linux website.
And I see your point, however, potential users won't stay just because the page, you can have a good looking page, nothing fancy, just a little markup here and there, but if the user don't like at all the distribution, no matter if your page is atractive enough to bring the attention of new comers, the only potential users will be those who enjoy the distribution.
Based on that, I think that it's unnecessary to change something that it's already working fine, and I don't think that people who started to use slackware here on LQ felt dissapointed when they saw the page for the first time, I know I didn't, the page didn't scare me away.
I say more color contrasts in the web site would be nice at least to make it more clear. If it's all white like it is now it's hard to see where to click or to distinguish sections from background. (changing the background to something darker would help for example, and if the buttons would become highlighted when moused over, that would be great it would fix pretty much everything appearance-wise).
I'm not so sure that the navigation is the strong point, it's not bad - but there could be a bit more "eye-catching" areas of the site to highlight the most important elements of the site (getslack and community/support I think could do with being fairly prominent). Also, there is a little ambiguity in the link text I would have said (i.e. if I read the list quickly, then decided I wanted to find out about the distro, I'd click "about", when actually the majority of the content is in "general info"). For an idea of what I mean see this quick draft (though, note it's mainly to give an idea of structure [I'm no designer], and since I was writing markup as I was going along layout bugs are possible).
The design however, is adequate, and the structure too. So it's not a great priority. I would have said centralising things into one knowledge base to avoid duplication of effort is more important at this stage. The current spread out system of community and support does work, but I would say it really works best for people who've been using it for a while - and that new users are left in the dark about how this spread out community operates. Plus, having things on one domain is very intuitive, it means you can standardise where all the parts are (i.e. you could guess that the wiki might be at wiki.slackware.com if you know the forum is at forum.slackware.com, and it's easy to remember once you know the convention). Alternatively, if we don't want to shift to one server those could be made to redirect as necessary.
Last edited by PsychoticDude85; 01-16-2008 at 06:27 PM.
Since Slackware 12.1 is to be released relatively soon, it seems like a good time to look back on some of the posts in this thread and compare what has actually changed.
Here's another vote for postgresql, the most powerful open source database server. Postgres running on slackware is a perfect match, solid and dependable.
Yes, it is outdated isn't it. I'd also like the site to change a bit, just to make it more readable and maybe improve the look while you're at it. I wonder ... if I were to make a new site design, then submit it ... would it have a chance ? Or would I be wasting my time ? And, no, it won't look like my site, I made it that way just to save time, I didn't put much time into it.
Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 04-13-2008 at 01:44 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.