SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: VM Host: Slackware-current, VM Guests: Artix, Venom, antiX, Gentoo, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OpenIndiana
Posts: 1,011
Rep:
Quote:
Edit in: FWIW, I have not had any problems with 4.19.3/4/5 with -current and the recent Nvidia "Long lived" or "short lived" drivers.
I did - possibly (would have to investigate, but ext4 died).
Quote:
a) What distribution are you running (it appears that many people
reporting problems are running Ubuntu, but this may be a sampling
issue; lots of people run Ubuntu)? (For the record, I'm using Debian
Testing.)
Slackware-current
Quote:
(b) What hardware are you using? (SSD? SATA-attached? NVMe-attached?)
SSD, SATA-attached
Quote:
(c) Are you using LVM? LUKS (e.g., disk encrypted)?
I have two SSD disks (SATA), the one that failed was unencrypted, with four primary partitions only
( I have encrypted partition on the second SSD - but this one thankfully is ok)
Quote:
(d) are you using discard? One theory is a recent discard change may
be in play. How do you use discard? (mount option, fstrim, etc.)
yes I am using discard
e.g.
/dev/sda1 / ext4 discard,noatime,errors=remount-ro 1 1
In preparation for hopefully a new stable release in the next month or two ( a guy can hope) it was time to test the latest kernel 4.19.y. Happily I can report that 4.19.5 does build under 14.2 and I've been running for last 24 hours without issues. I used the config file from dusks 4.19 /config directory as a starter config, executed make oldconfig, then make menuconfig, changed a few things for the emachine Pentium D 820 (older processor), saved, and then executed the standard remaining steps to build a kernel. Currently running as well as the last 4.4.164 kernel from last week. Using straight nouveau with an NVIDIA 8400GS card. Stable Slackware64 with llvm on ext4 SATA drive, no multilib, only QT5 and vlc from AlienBob. Seems quite stable. Now if I could just get the crazy USB 058f:6377 Alcor Micro Corp. AU6375 4-LUN card internal reader to actually function correctly (ie allow read/write and respond in less than 15 seconds to card insertions) my system would be really stable. Cheers, BrianA_MN
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,126
Original Poster
Rep:
It looks like the STIBP problem will be resolved with the release of the 4.19.7 kernel update due out late tomorrow or early Thursday, depending on your time zone.
I used the config file from dusks 4.19 /config directory as a starter config, executed make oldconfig, then make menuconfig, changed a few things for the emachine Pentium D 820 (older processor), saved, and then executed the standard remaining steps to build a kernel.
Curious, why not official 4.19 config directly from PV? You can find it here:
Because that config is for -current Slackware. Dusk's is for stable (at this time 14.2). I didn't want to use the 4.19.5 config from PV in case it had any changes implemented specifically for packages of -current or newer CPU and hardware. Dusk's version was specifically for "stable" x86_64. I did do a diff -y of the two files ans say PV's has some hardware specific changes for current. I also note that in the -current changelog that PV has implemented some specific kernel config changes for -current binaries (like newer gcc and glibc) and new hardware than I'm NOT using. I did not want to chase ghosts or functionality introduced for newer hardware and binary packages than stable requires. It would be interesting to try a kernel build with PV's config against 14.2, but I wanted a more sure config. So why didn't I just use Dusk's kernel binary builds? Because I know how to build for my specific installation with stable's gcc and glibc. May be the kernel building experts know more about which config to start with and I'm willing to learn from them. My decisions were to take a cautious approach, and that worked. HTH Cheers BrianA_MN
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.