SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Linux 4.20-rc3
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sun Nov 18 2018 - 17:07:32 EST
The only unusual thing last week was my travel - not any code issues.
That caused a few pulls to be delayed by a day or two, but nothing
else.
And now I'm back home, and 4.20-rc3 is out there.
The changes in rc3 are pretty tiny, which means that the statistics
look slightly different from the uysual ones - drivers only account
for less than a third of the patch, for example. But that really isn't
because of anything odd going on anywhere else, it all looks like just
random noise in the distribution of patches. So we have about one
third driver updates, one third arch updates, and one third "core"
(kernel, mm, fs, networking).
..but a far more interesting question is: do we really want it to?
Reading further in the kernel threads (after I'd had coffee), it seems like the behavior will change to not be on by default going forward? It does seem like a sensible decision.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,095
Original Poster
Rep:
When this patch will be applied, I don't know.
More on STIBP,
Quote:
[PATCH] x86/speculation: Revert turning on STIBP all the time
From: Tim Chen
Date: Wed Nov 21 2018 - 15:33:52 EST
Commit 53c613fe "x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre v2 STIBP mitigation"
turns on STIBP all the time.
This causes large performance regression in many workloads.
One case is perlbench in the SpecInt Rate 2006 test suite which shows a
21% reduction in throughput.
There're also other reports of drop in performance on Python and PHP benchmarks: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...0-bisect&num=2
STIBP on all the time should not be the default option.
Turn off STIBP all the time for now till STIBP can be applied on
a per task basis.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
edit: apologies 'cwiz. Hadn't noticed you'd already posted that link ( I only saw the post I was replying to.)
P.S. At the moment I'm seriously contemplating turning off all but Meltdown.
I did all those microcode updates and what not when the spectre/meltdown patches stared rolling out. I ran it for a week then rolled back my bios. The performance hit was very noticeable and to me was not worth it on my desktop machine. If someone wanted to hack me that bad I am sure they would find another way. On a server or business machine I understand the importance, but I don't like the idea of a huge performance hit being forced upon me. I hope they stick to the per task basis idea.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,095
Original Poster
Rep:
OK, here we go. STIBP will be reverted in the 4.19.4 update.
Quote:
[PATCH 4.19 00/42] 4.19.4-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Nov 21 2018 - 14:06:52 EST
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.4 release.
There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know..........
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux 4.19.4-rc1
4.19 kernels are playing hell with my Intel GM965 chipset. This is a well known bug and no one upstream seems to care about it because apparently it's too old (circa 1997/8 here).
Found a solution for this last week, but was hoping the 4.19.3 or 4.19.4 would take care of it.
Add this to your boot command line:
Code:
video=SVIDEO-1:d
Have the same chipset on a Compaq 6910p, boots and starts X fast! I keep trying new kernels without it, but it still slows it down.
Fix this by sanitizing req.gid before calling macro GID_TO_GRU, which
uses it to index gru_base.
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
completed with a dependent load/store [1].
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.