SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'crc32c_intel': No such device"
Are you using btrfs?
That will try to load crc32c_intel if it detects an Intel CPU, but if that CPU doesn't support the required extended opcodes, then the module load will fail and crc32c_generic will be loaded instead. Other than the error message from modprobe there shouldn't be any ill effects (you can check lsmod output to see that the crc32c_generic module was loaded instead).
Something should probably be a bit smarter about this so that perhaps it's just a warning rather than an error message, but given that it involves userspace module loading I'm not sure how they would go about that, or which "they" would be considered responsible.
Slackware64-current/4.19.0 boot problems as qemu-kvm guest
Hello folks,
I have a Slackware64-current qemu-kvm guest under Centos 6.10(*).
After slackpkg update to Tue Oct 23 05:11:47 UTC 2018 (kernel 4.19.0), VM reboots after loading initrd.img
Reverted to older set of kernel txz files using upgradepkg, boots cleanly again.
Well, okay.
Tried booting slackware64-current-install-dvd.iso based on Tue Oct 23 05:11:47 UTC 2018, same problem.
Tried booting slackware64-current-16_Oct_2018-DVD.iso, all is well.
Sadly, it has been a long time since I have built a custom kernel. Maybe it's a KVM thing. Any ideas?
Thanks, Rob Clark
(*) The last of the V8 Interceptors; shame they blew it up.
Last edited by slackware_platypus; 10-24-2018 at 02:37 PM.
In 4.19, when I close the laptop lid, the screen turns off, the fan does not spin down; on opening the lid, the screen does not turn back on, and the laptop is pingable, but I can't SSH in. With 4.18, there are no problems. I'm running Slackware current. I have KDE configured to put the laptop to sleep when the lid is closed. Going to do some digging.
In 4.19, when I close the laptop lid, the screen turns off, the fan does not spin down; on opening the lid, the screen does not turn back on, and the laptop is pingable, but I can't SSH in. With 4.18, there are no problems. I'm running Slackware current. I have KDE configured to put the laptop to sleep when the lid is closed. Going to do some digging.
I would ssh in before you close the lid and then run 'dmesg -w'. Then when you reproduce the issue you hopefully will be able to see some helpful debugging output.
I would ssh in before you close the lid and then run 'dmesg -w'. Then when you reproduce the issue you hopefully will be able to see some helpful debugging output.
Ran dmesg -w with 4.18 and 4.19: among the differences were
That unfortunately doesn't look as helpful as I hoped... I'm personally sticking with 4.18.x until 4.19 matures more since everything seems to be working at the moment.
Just want to say thanks to idlemoor for his DUSK kernels.
4.19 kernels are playing hell with my Intel GM965 chipset. This is a well known bug and no one upstream seems to care about it because apparently it's too old (circa 1997/8 here).
The 4.18 kernels that previously came with -current were not quite as bad, but with the 4.19 I think that the drm_kms_helper going "flip_done timeout" is the culprit and has slowed my boot down to ~10 minutes from cold boot to desktop.
I have dropped back to 4.4.162 and now it's flying again. I am going to be testing out newer versions of DUSK this weekend. Maybe try to mod one of the scripts for 4.9.x and that'll give me a extra year of LTS.
But I am worried about breakage. Is there anything that I should be concerned with running the 4.4.x kernels on -current? This is not a "production" machine.
But I am worried about breakage. Is there anything that I should be concerned with running the 4.4.x kernels on -current?
I assume that you don't, as long as your hardware is happy with it and it's not declared EOL.
EDIT: not all bug fixes are back ported, for instance I am aware of one that is already submitted for inclusion but will probably only make it in 4.21 thus won't be applied in Slackware 15.0.
But if you are not suffering of a bug you consider annoying enough to upgrade you kernel to get a fix, that's OK.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 10-27-2018 at 02:27 PM.
Reason: EDIT added.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,097
Original Poster
Rep:
This was originally posted in the "Request for -current" thread, but I thought it would be more appropriate to post it here. (Yeah, I know, I have too much time on my hands. I need to go back to work and get out of the house ) All but the first sentence has been removed from the post in the -current thread. This has been edited, a little, to bring it up to date.
************
The 4.19 kernel has been running on this box for 8-1/2 days now without so much as a hiccup or a sneeze.
First, I used the dusk-4.19-generic kernel with an initrd, of course, and when it became available, Mr. Volkerding's 4.19-huge kernel. There have been no problems with VirtualBox, WINE, dosemu, VLC, SMPlayer, LibreOffice, VeraCrypt, XnView MP, Adobe Reader, google-earth, streaming video in Firefox or Vivaldi, browsing the 'Net with Pale Moon and it hasn't been necessary to rebuild any SlackBuilds. (edit in, Oh, and PulseAudio works just as advertised ).
This is with -current, updates were installed as they became available, and the Nivida-410.66 and then the 410.73 drivers. There were no problems with either Nvidia driver.
*******************
All the rest is new text.
This has been the smoothest upgrade to a new LTS kernel that I can remember, but, then, at my age, I can barely remember my name. When I get up in the morning, and, I've probably said this before (did I? ), I look in the mirror and say to myself, "Who is that old fart?"
Anyway, as we progress through the forthcoming upgrades, I'm going to keep 4.19.0 in my lilo.conf as the "fallback" kernel.
Perhaps, the newer hardware is fast enough that it no longer matters, but it is now to the point I cannot "see or feel" any difference between a generic kernel (and initrd) and the huge kernel. OTOH, I would imagine a performance difference could be measured with the proper utilities.
Last edited by cwizardone; 10-30-2018 at 11:31 PM.
Perhaps, the newer hardware is fast enough that it no longer matters, but it is now to the point I cannot "see or feel" any difference between a generic kernel (and initrd) and the huge kernel. OTOH, I would imagine a performance difference could be measured with the proper utilities.
As far as I can tell, the only real difference between the huge and generic kernels is the number of modules built. I used a tutorial to find out how to compile only those modules my system actually needs. A side benefit is that the time required to compile modules is drastically reduced.
Perhaps, the newer hardware is fast enough that it no longer matters, but it is now to the point I cannot "see or feel" any difference between a generic kernel (and initrd) and the huge kernel. OTOH, I would imagine a performance difference could be measured with the proper utilities.
I'm glad you said this, I was beginning to wonder. I think for me the difference in boot speed between the two can't be more than about five seconds on my slowest machine. Having said that, I use persistent naming so I have to have an initrd anyway.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.