SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
See posts #2784 and #2790 in this thread.
Since post #2790, there have been three or four new releases. Currently, I have Test Build Linux 64-bit, 6.1.x revision 141968, installed and it works just fine.
We will probably see a new release within the next business day or two.
success! Only caveat is that simply adding "CONFIG_NVME_HWMON=y" does not work. I misread the depends line in the kernel config. For this to work it requires "NVME_CORE [=m]=y && HWMON [=m]=y || NVME_CORE [=m]=m && HWMON [=m]" in the kernel config. So either hardware monitoring support has to be static and not a module. Or NVME_CORE needs to be a module and not static. For my experiment I made hardware monitoring support a module instead of static. After I was done I got a interesting surprise, not only did I have nvme temperature support but it was also showing the temperature of my wifi adapter. That doesn't matter since I am about to disable it in the bios now that my Intel i225-V works properly.
Well I don't know what changed between kernel 5.10.1 and 5.10.2, but now hardware monitoring support needs to be static and not a module to get nvme hardware support. I ran "make xconfig" and the option for nvme hardware monitoring is visible but can't be enabled until hardware monitoring support is changed from a module to static. I made another request, hopefully Pat will enable this on the next kernel release.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,108
Original Poster
Rep:
The 5.9.y kernel series has been designated, End Of Life.
Quote:
Linux 5.9.16
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Dec 21 2020 - 08:25:14 EST
I'm announcing the release of the 5.9.16 kernel.
All users of the 5.9 kernel series must upgrade.
NOTE, this is the LAST 5.9.y kernel to be released unless something
really odd happens. Please move to 5.10.y at this point in time, the
5.9.y branch is now end-of-life...........
I use an AppImage of qBittorrent to stay clear from system turbulence on -current. Is this an option for you?
Thanks, I just downgraded to 5.4.85 and everything is working. Since the newer kernels doesn't offer much unless using new hardware, I don't see the purpose. I like to test and tinker with new things but if stuff is gonna break, I'll stay on a stable release. Not sure if the Bluetooth was fixed in the 5.10.2 but I haven't tried it.
It looks like 5.4 will outlive 5.10, by a lot. I guess we will be seeing Slackware 15.1 fairly quickly if 5.10 gets picked for 15.0 :P
I do not think that the life of a LTS kernel matters.
In the experience, after no more than one year a LTS release becomes obsolete.
And also the experience demonstrated that 5.4.x works quite well with Slackware 14.2
So, if Mr. Volkerding wants to maintain the Slackware 15.0 kernel(s) for 8 years, all he have to do is to update them. Probably with the LTS kernels, waiting for 20 or something patch releases...
In the end, would be no differences, other that the stable release will get new hardware support. Which probably is better, because in 4 years the hardware evolves a lot.
Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 12-22-2020 at 05:06 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.