SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It is to be expected, as they sometime ago replaced the traditional init system with upstart.
I am sure all the advanced users who use ubuntu kept up with this development, and obviously those who do not care about ubuntu did not.
Upstart has many advantages, as listed on the wiki page.
Could well be part of the upstart system and (presumably for backwards compatibility) it does look in inittab, but there is no runlevel in ubuntu's inittab by default (for sure on 8.04). Here it is FYI
Code:
# rc - runlevel compatibility
#
# This task guesses what the "default runlevel" should be and starts the
# appropriate script.
start on stopped rcS
script
runlevel --reboot || true
if grep -q -w -- "-s\|single\|S" /proc/cmdline; then
telinit S
elif [ -r /etc/inittab ]; then
RL="$(sed -n -e "/^id:[0-9]*:initdefault:/{s/^id://;s/:.*//;p}" /etc/inittab || true)"
if [ -n "$RL" ]; then
telinit $RL
else
telinit 2
fi
else
telinit 2
fi
end script
As you commented, Josh000, upstart has many advantages but breaking boot script message logging (bootlogd functionality) is a significant disadvantage. Is it fixed in 10.04?
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
So xubuntu might suit you ... or is Xfce not to your liking?
Hmm, there is no very big different difference between Xfce and GNOME. Maybe Xfce is faster, but on a Intel Core2Duo GNOME is as fast as Xfce (but maybe KDE is a bit slower, but not on my PC)
I still see Slackware's 13 major number releases as Betas. The stable version is 12.2 for those interested. Slam64's 12.2 for 64 bit enthusiasts.
Ubuntu 10.04 is the first stable release we've gotten in a long time. 9.04 was a release candidate. 9.10 was the beta. 10.04 was the release.
The stable version is 10.04 for those interested.
I haven't seen a release since 2007 that properly burnt cdr's on my external dvdr burner. Wodim, cdrtools just started failing.
I've started using Nero for Linux. Superb piece of software.
I'm going out on a limb here but maybe the slackware dev's could take a look at the fine print on KOffice's website which states that KOffice 2 isn't ready for production. It's not even close to being feature complete. It's high time OpenOffice is included or a return to Abiword is in order.
It looks more and more like Slackware (init got face lift, what's next?)
The last time I paid much attention to what ubuntu were up to they were in the process of implementing an event-based init with a high degree of parallelism centred around 'upstart' and similar to what Apple did with Launchd in OS X.
That's about as far from Slackware's simple and reliable fixed-order sequential init system as you can get. Or are you referring to something else?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.