SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Wait a minute, when did anyone say WICD was being discontinued? The last release was 14 days ago and the website says absolutely nothing about the project being abandoned... In fact it very clearly says on the development page, "WICD is under active development." Whence comes the news of development halting?
Apparently you're referring to an *Arch* package of 1.7.0 which oozed out on 2011-03-21. However, the last released upstream file on Sourceforge is Beta 2 of 1.7.1 back on 2010-11-20. Also, to quibble with your words, Pat wrote "development has ceased", not "discontinued", and the difference between those words is illustrated by the announcement made on 2010-09-14 which can be found at https://launchpad.net/wicd/+announcement/6738 -- "Wicd development stalled"
Quote:
Written for wicd by Andrew Psaltis.
Howdy folks.
Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we (the wicd developers) can no longer dedicate much time to improving and fixing bugs within wicd.
If you wish do improve wicd, please contact the developers in #wicd on irc.freenode.net, and we can see what we can do.
But the difference between "ceased" and "discontinued" is de minimis when there have been only 17 code commits in the last year and six since 1.7.1b2.
For the record I happen to prefer wicd too, or at least its UI anyway, and I'm grateful for what the developers have been able to give us until now.
Last edited by 55020; 04-04-2011 at 08:15 PM.
Reason: Aha! You're referring to an Arch package!
2 members found this post helpful.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810
Rep:
Quote:
It seems that yesterday Pat update Slackware ARM with kernel 2.6.38.2, here.
As far as I know it's actually Stuart Winter behind ArmedSlack so I don't think this update has any bearing on Slackware itself. I know Stuart was originally responsible but I don't know if he's still the maintainer. Stuart said this on the mailing list some time ago which may be relevant :
Quote:
Slackware ARM usually has the latest stable kernel though, which usually
isn't in sync with Slackware x86 because as you say, the newer Kernels
usually contain ARM fixes.
As far as I know it's actually Stuart Winter behind ArmedSlack so I don't think this update has any bearing on Slackware itself. I know Stuart was originally responsible but I don't know if he's still the maintainer. Stuart said this on the mailing list some time ago which may be relevant :
I thought that I read somewhere that they were trying to make all the versions identical but for different architectures. So 2.6.38.2 might be in the running.
BUT....
Much more importantly I've just had six days off and was hoping to have a shiny new fresh install of Slackware64-13.37 (multi-lib). Hopefully we will have another release candidate soon or, better still, the final release.
F******k!!! I can't wait any longer... I feel awful... if Slackware 13.37's not released in the next month then I'm gonna install a cracked version of Windoze on my slackbox and convert every file I have to an Office Open XML variant!
Well you could always upgrade to -current now, get something that is probably 99% the same as what 13.37 will turn out to be and as an added bonus you may even contribute to its stability by finding any remaining bugs. Win win!
That's a lot o stuff.. (okay: I need NetworkManager only if I wish to CLi, but to get the about a gui, I need the applet, and the applet needs Gnome-keyring, which depends on Gconf, ORBit2 and Libtasn1,... I just wonder if that's worth it.
hmm. pitty wicd's development has ceased, but I already think it is indeed way <<<< that NetworkManager..
*Back on Topic*
leet: It will be worth the wait.
*and remember: Slackware is like coffee: The longer it takes to fill your cup, the better the quality of the tar provided! ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_%28tobacco_residue%29 -> note the pipe-smoking-tar-providing-penguin )
If you're building stuff like network-manager-applet with quite a few dependencies using the wonderful Sbopkg I highly recommend getting the queue files - they make this kind of build very easy and are a great help with any build with lots of dependence requirements.
If you're building stuff like network-manager-applet with quite a few dependencies using the wonderful Sbopkg I highly recommend getting the queue files - they make this kind of build very easy and are a great help with any build with lots of dependence requirements.
That takes care of the build, but what would you recommend for the lingering feelings of nausea and self-loathing?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.