LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2011, 08:05 PM   #376
55020
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,307
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones View Post
Wait a minute, when did anyone say WICD was being discontinued? The last release was 14 days ago and the website says absolutely nothing about the project being abandoned... In fact it very clearly says on the development page, "WICD is under active development." Whence comes the news of development halting?
Apparently you're referring to an *Arch* package of 1.7.0 which oozed out on 2011-03-21. However, the last released upstream file on Sourceforge is Beta 2 of 1.7.1 back on 2010-11-20. Also, to quibble with your words, Pat wrote "development has ceased", not "discontinued", and the difference between those words is illustrated by the announcement made on 2010-09-14 which can be found at https://launchpad.net/wicd/+announcement/6738 -- "Wicd development stalled"

Quote:
Written for wicd by Andrew Psaltis.

Howdy folks.

Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we (the wicd developers) can no longer dedicate much time to improving and fixing bugs within wicd.

If you wish do improve wicd, please contact the developers in #wicd on irc.freenode.net, and we can see what we can do.
But the difference between "ceased" and "discontinued" is de minimis when there have been only 17 code commits in the last year and six since 1.7.1b2.

For the record I happen to prefer wicd too, or at least its UI anyway, and I'm grateful for what the developers have been able to give us until now.

Last edited by 55020; 04-04-2011 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Aha! You're referring to an Arch package!
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 04-04-2011, 08:40 PM   #377
Gullible Jones
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 10
Ah, sorry for the trouble then. Kind of a shame, wicd is pretty cool.
 
Old 04-06-2011, 06:54 AM   #378
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762
ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/s...nt/UPGRADE.TXT

Code:
1.  Upgrade your package utilities and related tools:

    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/pkgtools-*.tgz
    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/tar-*.tgz
    installpkg /root/slackware/a/xz-*.tgz
    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/findutils-*.txz
shouldn't that be:

Code:
1.  Upgrade your package utilities and related tools:

    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/pkgtools-*.tgz
    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/tar-*.tgz
    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/xz-*.tgz
    upgradepkg /root/slackware/a/findutils-*.txz
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-06-2011, 08:53 AM   #379
sahko
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,041

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yeah seems that part is leftover from 13.1
 
Old 04-07-2011, 05:57 AM   #380
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Rep: Reputation: 50
It seems that yesterday Pat update Slackware ARM with kernel 2.6.38.2, here.

So it's possible it will Slackware 13.37 have kernel 2.6.38.2?
 
Old 04-07-2011, 06:50 AM   #381
bgeddy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Liverpool - England
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
Quote:
It seems that yesterday Pat update Slackware ARM with kernel 2.6.38.2, here.
As far as I know it's actually Stuart Winter behind ArmedSlack so I don't think this update has any bearing on Slackware itself. I know Stuart was originally responsible but I don't know if he's still the maintainer. Stuart said this on the mailing list some time ago which may be relevant :
Quote:
Slackware ARM usually has the latest stable kernel though, which usually
isn't in sync with Slackware x86 because as you say, the newer Kernels
usually contain ARM fixes.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-07-2011, 09:43 AM   #382
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Rep: Reputation: 50
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgeddy View Post
As far as I know it's actually Stuart Winter behind ArmedSlack so I don't think this update has any bearing on Slackware itself. I know Stuart was originally responsible but I don't know if he's still the maintainer. Stuart said this on the mailing list some time ago which may be relevant :
Thanks for the explain
 
Old 04-07-2011, 10:22 AM   #383
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Kirkwall, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.3 - Cinnamon
Posts: 1,425

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
I thought that I read somewhere that they were trying to make all the versions identical but for different architectures. So 2.6.38.2 might be in the running.

BUT....

Much more importantly I've just had six days off and was hoping to have a shiny new fresh install of Slackware64-13.37 (multi-lib). Hopefully we will have another release candidate soon or, better still, the final release.

samac
 
Old 04-07-2011, 01:36 PM   #384
boler
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: London
Distribution: slackware64-current
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 16
F******k!!! I can't wait any longer... I feel awful... if Slackware 13.37's not released in the next month then I'm gonna install a cracked version of Windoze on my slackbox and convert every file I have to an Office Open XML variant!
 
Old 04-07-2011, 02:06 PM   #385
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762Reputation: 1762


Well you could always upgrade to -current now, get something that is probably 99% the same as what 13.37 will turn out to be and as an added bonus you may even contribute to its stability by finding any remaining bugs. Win win!
 
Old 04-07-2011, 02:40 PM   #386
sjampoo
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Oosterbeek, The Netherlands
Distribution: Desk and Lap: Slackware13.1 64
Posts: 203
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormtracknole View Post
In my humble opinion, NetworkManager > > > > > WICD. Just my opinion though.
Oh.. it is: so much bigger..

I used WICD until now. I'm (trying) to configure NetworkManager as we speak. Via sbopkg..

- NetworkManager
- ORBit2
- libtasn1
- Gconf
- Gnome-keyring
- pptp
- Network-pptp
- Network-applet

That's a lot o stuff.. (okay: I need NetworkManager only if I wish to CLi, but to get the about a gui, I need the applet, and the applet needs Gnome-keyring, which depends on Gconf, ORBit2 and Libtasn1,... I just wonder if that's worth it.

hmm. pitty wicd's development has ceased, but I already think it is indeed way <<<< that NetworkManager..

*Back on Topic*

leet: It will be worth the wait.
*and remember: Slackware is like coffee: The longer it takes to fill your cup, the better the quality of the tar provided! ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_%28tobacco_residue%29 -> note the pipe-smoking-tar-providing-penguin )
 
Old 04-07-2011, 03:57 PM   #387
bgeddy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Liverpool - England
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
Quote:
- NetworkManager
- ORBit2
- libtasn1
- Gconf
- Gnome-keyring
- pptp
- Network-pptp
- Network-applet

That's a lot o stuff.
If you're building stuff like network-manager-applet with quite a few dependencies using the wonderful Sbopkg I highly recommend getting the queue files - they make this kind of build very easy and are a great help with any build with lots of dependence requirements.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-07-2011, 04:13 PM   #388
55020
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,307
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgeddy View Post
If you're building stuff like network-manager-applet with quite a few dependencies using the wonderful Sbopkg I highly recommend getting the queue files - they make this kind of build very easy and are a great help with any build with lots of dependence requirements.
That takes care of the build, but what would you recommend for the lingering feelings of nausea and self-loathing?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-07-2011, 04:33 PM   #389
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55020 View Post
but what would you recommend for the lingering feelings of nausea and self-loathing?
A few drinks, and a session with the Emacs psychotherapist.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-07-2011, 04:38 PM   #390
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Kirkwall, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.3 - Cinnamon
Posts: 1,425

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Yeah! But not quite as effective as a session with the Vi psychologist.

samac
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Making Slackware and Slackware Derivative Linux Distros Speak Your Language LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-29-2009 12:30 AM
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration