LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-25-2018, 05:42 PM   #16
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483

Quote:
Originally Posted by solarfields View Post
for me the Slackware and SBo combination offers a good compromise. We have Slackware as a stable, conservative and very well tested base, combined with very recent and actively updated third party software.
how long does it take to compile qt5 with 8 cores. I know.
you try it.
 
Old 05-25-2018, 05:49 PM   #17
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55020 View Post
Hi Drakeo, I gather you have a problem with building qt5 from SlackBuilds.org?

If you are running Slackware 14.1, use qt5-5.5.1. This has not changed since November 2015.

If you are running Slackware 14.2, use qt5-5.7.1. This has not changed since February 2017.

If you are running -current, you are a beta tester. If you don't like being a beta tester, please go back to 14.2, where qt5 has been stable for 471 days.

Thanks for the feedback!
I have no issue with qt5. love kde5 great tool if Pat does not go that way or Bob's latest blob far from stable. Will seek another distro. been slack since 2004.
love the KDE team donate to them. none of them shoved qt 5 into slackware throats.
 
Old 05-25-2018, 05:57 PM   #18
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by montagdude View Post
I like it how it works now. We get to have a nice stable base system (Slackware) while still getting the latest and greatest applications (SBo).
I disagree ask what part of cmake and qt in slackware work. Ton of work. try it out. take simple screen recorder use qt5 to build it I have builds for it. compile qt5 ok have fun fixing things.
 
Old 05-25-2018, 06:21 PM   #19
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
Also: everything on SBo is tested on a a complete new -stable installation.

Or at least it's supposed to be.
nope
 
Old 05-25-2018, 06:53 PM   #20
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,504

Rep: Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461Reputation: 8461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakeo View Post
how long does it take to compile qt5 with 8 cores. I know.
you try it.
It takes 2.5 days on a single core Atom with 2GB RAM.
 
9 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-25-2018, 11:34 PM   #21
Skaendo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: West Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2
Posts: 1,445

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakeo View Post
how long does it take to compile qt5 with 8 cores. I know.
you try it.
4 hours 10 minutes

Intel Core i3 2130 @ 3.4 GHz & 8 GB RAM (2 core with HT/8 threads, -j8)

Last edited by Skaendo; 05-25-2018 at 11:42 PM.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-26-2018, 01:55 AM   #22
solarfields
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: slackalaxy.com
Distribution: Slackware, CRUX
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakeo View Post
how long does it take to compile qt5 with 8 cores. I know.
you try it.
I make an exception for QT5 and install AlienBob's precompiled package.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-26-2018, 02:19 AM   #23
55020
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,307
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Drakeo, if you're using ponce's github repo, you must be running current.

If you are running -current, you are a beta tester. Shit happens to beta testers. If you don't like shit happening to you, go back to 14.2.

If you are NOT running -current, don't use ponce's github repo.

Thread solved.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-26-2018, 04:28 AM   #24
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakeo View Post
nope
YES! The scripts at slackbuilds.org are all tested by the admins.

They use a full installation of Slackware. Not including stuff from the /extra or /pasture directories.
You say "nope".
I would like that you explain which SlackBuild scripts on SBO are not working on a full installation of Slackware 14.2 (or on whatever version they are targeting).
Why are they not working in your opinion?

The SBo admins will test ZERO scripts on slackware-current when they are QA testing.

The repository with modifications / updates / patches that ponce is maintaining outside of SBo is targeting slackware-current but that git repository is not part of slackbuilds.org.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-26-2018, 06:39 AM   #25
RadicalDreamer
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 1,816

Rep: Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981
qjackctl 0.4.1 for Slackware 14.1 has a dependency on qt5. qjackctl 0.3.9 for Slackware 14.0 does not. https://slackbuilds.org/result/?search=qjackctl+&sv=
 
Old 05-26-2018, 07:58 AM   #26
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
So, considering that qjackctl recomends itself to "provides a simple GUI dialog for setting several JACK daemon parameters" it is really and really need of compiling that huge crap which include even the Chromium and has tons of sensible dependencies...

Yeah, sure! But, last time when I compiled the Qt5, was about 6 hours in a Phenom x4 9650 at 2.3GHz, 8GB RAM, and mechanical hard drives.

Excuse me, but SBO started to look really ridiculous.

You guys forget that not all people buy annually a $5000 computer just to toy with your builds...

Last edited by Darth Vader; 05-26-2018 at 08:10 AM.
 
Old 05-26-2018, 08:04 AM   #27
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
YES! The scripts at slackbuilds.org are all tested by the admins.

They use a full installation of Slackware. Not including stuff from the /extra or /pasture directories.
Yeah, man! BUT the users does not use clean full installations, because they install other packages, some even SBO generated.

THEN, it is safely to assume that the packages are built in "dirty" systems by the SBO users, so depending on what the user already installed, the build may or may not pick particular features.

Long story short, I believe that the SBO scripts never generate the same packages, because the particular conditions where the packages are built.

AND, how SBO lacks the support for build-dependencies and it is unable to check and tune them, it is safely to assume that this endeavor is a failed design from start.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 05-26-2018 at 08:07 AM.
 
Old 05-26-2018, 08:10 AM   #28
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
Lat time I compiled the Qt5, was about 6 hours in a Phenom x4 9650 at 2.3GHz, 8GB RAM, and mechanical hard drives.

Excuse me, but SBO Qt started to look really ridiculous.
Fixed that one for you.

Other than where to attribute blame, I'm in agreement though. That build time is unreasonable.

Qt is bloated and far to much effort to build.
gtk+ is a moving target app developers are constantly having to chase!

Motif may be a little ugly by present day standards but I'm starting to think it's the lesser of evils and that it's time for a revival!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-26-2018, 08:25 AM   #29
solarfields
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: slackalaxy.com
Distribution: Slackware, CRUX
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
darth, you seem to be whining about something, but would you specify what it is that you don't approve about SBo? What would you change?
 
Old 05-26-2018, 08:30 AM   #30
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
It is simple: I believe that adding the Qt5 as dependency on SBO is purely madness.

Also, even thinking that someone thought to invite people to build Qt5 into "dirty" systems is laughable.

Looks like some people lives in a fantasy world with dragons, dungeons and 64 cores CPUs.

What I will change? I will remove every little bit of Qt5 from the SBO repositories.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 05-26-2018 at 08:35 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] how long is debian stable supported fully? after a new stable i s released. rubankumars Debian 5 07-06-2017 03:59 AM
tar.gz of a gnome-panel more stable for debian stable :lol frenchn00b Debian 4 05-07-2008 10:32 AM
Use SlackBuilds.org or my own hosting to offer up SlackBuilds? hollywoodb Slackware 6 11-30-2006 08:56 PM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 08:49 PM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 11:25 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration