LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2024, 01:34 AM   #16
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,226

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320

FTP and upgradepkg for updates. ./configure; make; make install for everything else.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-11-2024, 01:37 AM   #17
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,451
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackerold View Post
But how was it done in the past before using slackpkg for system updates?
There are a million answers to this question.

They way I did it was to keep an up-to-date local repository of the Slackware stable tree, and manually apply updates whenever they were found.

slackpkg has eased things quite a bit... but it wasn't until 15.0 that I started using it properly. Habit can be a powerful force.

It was OTB's (RIP) 15.0 installation video which showed how easy slackpkg is, that made me realise I'd been doing things the hard way for several years.
 
Old 03-11-2024, 03:09 AM   #18
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,972

Rep: Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551
In the beginning, I found it best to save what you wanted to keep and reinstall from scratch. With Slackware 9.1 slackpkg and swaret were introduced, checkinstall was added in version 9.0. With Slackware 10.0 Patrick started adding obsolete packages to UPGRADE.TXT and also added slacktrack. Being stubborn, I stuck with manual upgrades. Eventually I started using slackpkg, I was hooked. I have never used swaret or slacktrack. Keep track on third party the hard way. Back then I normally used pre-built packages. When the third party slackpkg+ was introduced I gave it a try and loved it.

Today I build almost all of my own packages, have my own repository for them. The only pre-built packages I use are multilib and 14 packages from Alien Bob, plus 3 from Alien Bob's restricted repository. Oh and slackpkg+, which I use with slackpkg.
 
Old 03-11-2024, 10:55 AM   #19
chemfire
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 422

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Started using Slackware around 99 as my daily driver. Still don't use slackpkg. Nothing against just never needed it. I used to watch the change long and just download what I needed.

These days I just rsync the tree from a mirror and periodically run
upgradepkg *.t?z in the /patches directory.

When it comes time to do the distro upgrade, I usually do about what is described in UPGRADE.TXT.

If I wanted to run -current, I'd probably start using slackpkg though.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-11-2024, 11:26 AM   #20
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys
Posts: 4,784

Rep: Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434Reputation: 4434
Hello hazel, FWIW I never allow slackpkg to upgrade kernels. I roll my own so I, too, blacklist kernel packages, source, modules and headers but allow firmware updates since those AFAIK are just "blobs" available for system hardware and the modules that communicate with and control them. TYhe most common benefit with kernel firmware updates are improved wifi and bluetooth function, which I rarely use, so that may make me overly cavalier about allowing firmware upgrades. I'm most interested in audio system drivers being at their best, so the minor risk, if any, is worth the possible gain.
 
Old 03-11-2024, 11:31 AM   #21
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I use slackpkg for updating everything, including kernels. No problems so far...touch wood...fingers crossed.
 
Old 03-11-2024, 11:36 AM   #22
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,579
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453Reputation: 4453
Quote:
Originally Posted by enorbet View Post
Hello hazel, FWIW I never allow slackpkg to upgrade kernels. I roll my own so I, too, blacklist kernel packages, source, modules and headers
I allow headers. They're harmless and serve as a heads-up that there's a new kernel available. I don't need firmware, as my machine uses standard hardware (Intel processor and graphics, realtech network card).

As to rolling my own kernel, I used to do that on CRUX where it is compulsory. It had the advantage of creating very small kernels which didn't need an initrd. I don't do it on Slackware, as I assume Patrick has optimised the kernel config in ways that I couldn't hope to emulate.
 
Old 03-11-2024, 12:04 PM   #23
saxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Nova Gorica, Salvador
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,213

Rep: Reputation: 297Reputation: 297Reputation: 297
To be honest I don't remeber anymore, but surely installpkg or upgradepkg, and removepkg, the friends you still have today in. But I have to mention that I rarely did keep it up to date like today in the past.
The internet was slow 14,4kbps then 56kbps then ISDN line then ADSL and today FTTH. So the laziness was really the real cause for me but as somebody already mentioned you had pretty anything you need in the distro
and you had to just install some extra stuff with configure,make and make in stall and keep that up to date if needed.

I using it from 3.4 release or something like that, I still have my wallnut creek cds and should be somewhere in the flopies too
 
Old 03-11-2024, 03:45 PM   #24
Tonus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-15.0
Posts: 1,405
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514Reputation: 514
I had forgotten swaret ! And checkinstall to build packages (?)...

I think was downloading packages and use pkgtool I guess.

I don't even remember well when I bothered to look at slackbuilds...
 
Old 03-11-2024, 04:05 PM   #25
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
swaret was a tool in Slackware for about a release and a half (written by Patrick Volkerding more than ten years ago). It is still available but I have no idea how many people use it, if any. According to the website the last release is 20 years old.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-11-2024, 05:22 PM   #26
glorsplitz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Distribution: slackware!
Posts: 1,308

Rep: Reputation: 368Reputation: 368Reputation: 368Reputation: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
I don't do it on Slackware, as I assume Patrick has optimised the kernel config in ways that I couldn't hope to emulate.
yes to this
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One question, how was slackware used before slackpkg? slackerold LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 03-10-2024 01:25 PM
[SOLVED] How many LQ users do you have to give "Rep" to, before you can give the same LQ users more "Rep"? jsbjsb001 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 04-17-2017 04:38 PM
Howmany posts before user reputation is enable? TroN-0074 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 1 03-16-2012 12:25 PM
Do you think the reputation system should be used on this site? joeBuffer LQ Suggestions & Feedback 39 09-04-2009 09:10 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration