SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: How old are your computers running Slackware (click all that apply)?
Less than 1 year
42
20.00%
Between 1 and 2 years
42
20.00%
Between 2 and 3 years
38
18.10%
Between 3 and 4 years
45
21.43%
Between 4 and 5 years
43
20.48%
Between 5 and 6 years
45
21.43%
Between 6 and 7 years
37
17.62%
Older than 7 years
70
33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll
lol and i thought i would be a proud owner of a pc that 'doesn't fire on all cylinders' (taken from cartoon 'cars')..
i have a pII@350MHz, with 64Mb of RAM (don't ask me for its freq - it was not of any importance back then). running slack 10.2 on it.. - i learned the basics of unix as an OS and now about 1 year later from my initial contact with linux, im buying a brand new pc to set up as file and internet and firewall server and hopefully keep it as such for a lifetime if possible
the new pc is core 2 duo, 2GB of DDR2 ram, 1x40GB for OS, 3x 320GB in RAID5 for storage, with slack11 installed.. thats all the good stuff folks...
plan is to move out of windows in the near future both for the sake of the 'new' and for the sake of stop being illegal hehe
Until recently, I ran slack on an AMD Duron 750MHz with 512MB SDRAM, with a a 20GB primary drive, and a 160GB slave. I bought that second hand in 2001 for £350, so it was probably a year or two old then.
Having just stopped being a student and started working for a living, I treated myself to an IBM Thinkpad T40 from ebay. It's a 1.5GHz Pentium-M 512MB DDR, 40 GB hard drive little beast. I should think it's also a few years old (2? 3? does anyone know when these came out?)
In terms of speed, I have to confess, there's not an enormous difference, especially as I was running flux on the Duron, but it's a bit nicer having a laptop compared to a desktop, especially as my room is now smaller!
I have a Pentium I 200MHz with 128MB SDRAM and a 10GB hard drive kicking around at home which I one day plan to turn into a router, or maybe a file server for my mum - it will, of course, run slack!
I am a relatively new comer to the slackware world. Started with 10.0.
Here's a list of my machines,
Webserver - About 5 years old 1.8 GHz P4 768MB RAM. Works like a charm as my webserver.
Personal desktop - About 1.5 year old Athlon64 X2 4200+ 2.2GHz 1GB RAM. Personal desktop with 3 discs, one for WinXP, one for various Linux distro and the third one for data.
MythTV box - About 1 year old Athlon64 3700+ 2GHz 1GB RAM. Works as my mythbox connected to TV.
I got 2 machines. One is about 3 years old. It's a p4 prescott with a gig and a 1/2 terabyte of storage. the other is just a 750 duron with maybe 256 or 512 ram. Both run slack very nicely except the machine with my ati card in it for any kind of hardware accel.
but look the "older than 7 years" turns out to be the largest group.
i think the results may be a bit skewed here...
1) people w/old computers are more likely to run slack because the 'doitforyou' distros are too slow on older HW and the 'compileityourself' distros take too long to 'emerge' on old computers...
pwc101 - My work Thinkpad is a T40 with those specs. I got it in October 2003, so yours should be in the 3-4 year category.
I recently retired an IBM A20m that was running Fluxbox on Slackware 10.2. It's a Celeron 500MHz with 256MB of RAM, 12GB HDD. It was a decent always-on internet/email terminal. I finally shut it down with over 400 days of uptime. I replaced it after I got tired of waiting on webpages to render in Firefox.
The new laptop is an HP Compaq nx6110 that's a year old. It's a Pentium M 1.73MHz with 512MB RAM and a 40GB HDD. Slackware 11 runs very nicely on it.
My desktop is a home built Athlon XP 2500+ overclocked to 2.2Ghz. It used to be my Windows XP gaming machine until I swapped a bigger hard drive in, and you know - just never got around to reinstalling Windows. Over a year later and I haven't missed it. It's got 1GB of RAM and an nVidia 5900XT, so it's got my Linux game installs on it (Neverwinter Nights mainly). I haven't upgraded to Slackware 11 from 10.2 on that one.
80486 (purchased back in 1993)
100MHz
16MB RAM
850MB HHD
graphics: I've NO clue
But to be really honest it runs more or lest just the kernel. NO X, nothing! Only a few libraries, g++, perl, and pythom and least but not least, my favorite vim are on this HHD.
The common "hello world" program needs a couple of minutes to compile (ok, maybe more than 5min).
It was just a bet with myself, to get this fossile running.
Obviously I could have chosen a lighter distro, like dsl (I had trouble getting dsl installed) but I didn't care. I haven't worked on this box for ages, so... who cares!?! Maybe one day (when I am much more advanced in Linux), I could try something more appropriate.
By the way: tips and tricks are welcome!
1) people w/old computers are more likely to run slack because the 'doitforyou' distros are too slow on older HW and the 'compileityourself' distros take too long to 'emerge' on old computers...
Heh, that's why I like Slackware on my Plll 800 IBM. I ran FreeBSD 6.2 for quite awhile, but, got tired of the long compiling times. I compiled KDE 3.5.6 from source in FreeBSD and it took several days on that unit. Sackware is perfect for my older hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.