SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: How old are your computers running Slackware (click all that apply)?
Less than 1 year
42
20.00%
Between 1 and 2 years
42
20.00%
Between 2 and 3 years
38
18.10%
Between 3 and 4 years
45
21.43%
Between 4 and 5 years
43
20.48%
Between 5 and 6 years
45
21.43%
Between 6 and 7 years
37
17.62%
Older than 7 years
70
33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll
Well, I think manosagn has got us all beat so far, but what self respecting geek would pass up a chance to boast hardware.
My oldest box is a Dell Optiplex GXa, P2 266 MHz, complete with "Designed for Windows 95" sticker, that does duty as router/firewall.
Closely following that is my frankenputer, a Celeron 300 MHz (that runs quite happily without a cpu fan). I keep it around for when I feel the urge to kick something.
Then there's the Toshiba Satellite laptop, AMD K6 that does duty as printer/scanner server.
There are several others, including a relatively new Compaq tower that I use for toying around with various distros, BSDs and Solaris, and my main squeeze, a Sager P4 3.2GHz HT laptop.
All running Slackware, naturally.
The thing is, all this older hardware plus stable, reliable Slackware means that these boxes will be around for quite a while longer.
I have a Thinkpad (PII 300MHz) and a Duron 900 desktop (BIOS reports DuronXP 1200). The Duron should be seven by now, the other one even older. Both run Slack 11 just fine
I have a used Compaq Presario 1200US laptop (Intel 800MHz, 128MB Ram, 10 GHz HDD) with Slackware 11 running on it (BackTrack 2.2). I started dual booting with W2K, but within a month burned the box and reloaded with just BackTrack (I wasn't using windoze at all).
I've seen a couple of posts from people running Slackware 11 on 266MHz boxes! Now I'm thinking of taking my other Compaq laptop (a 1625), burning it and loading Slackware to it. A pity we have to rely on windoze at the job...
1-Siemens Amilo 1.7 GHz and 512MB ram about 2 years old running Slackware 11.0 with Dropline Gnome.
2-Toshiba Tecra S1 1.4 GHz and 1G ram about 4 years old running Slackware 11.0.
Maybe there should be two versions ... one for old, one for new. Or, I guess it also may be possible to keep it all in one version, but maybe have two options: for old computers and for new.
Maybe there should be two versions ... one for old, one for new. Or, I guess it also may be possible to keep it all in one version, but maybe have two options: for old computers and for new.
From my reading of the "current" changelog, that seems to be what Pat is intending. The possibility that he's mentioned is that the next version of Slackware will only have the 2.6 kernel, but Slackware 11 will continue to be supported for a long time -- presumably for those running older hardware.
From what I understand, no, he doesn't. I believe he was asked this (maybe I'm mistaken) when he once appeared in ##slackware on freenode.net.
From what I gather on http://www.slackware.com, his reference to these forums is for the Slackware users' benefit...I'm thinking that he knows the value of these forums, but there is no official forum. (in case you're hinting that he visits here because he lists linuxquestions.org on at slackware.com)
I'm not hinting at anything. I heard the interview with Pat Volkerding on The Linux Link Tech Show shortly after Slackware 11 was released. In that interview he states that this is pretty much the official support forum for Slackware. He goes into a little detail on how he spent time with Jeremy Garcia at a Linux conference and decided this is the place for user support.
I'm glad he did. This is a wonderful forum.
I just wondered if Pat trawled through here from time to time to see what we're all asking about.
From my reading of the "current" changelog, that seems to be what Pat is intending. The possibility that he's mentioned is that the next version of Slackware will only have the 2.6 kernel, but Slackware 11 will continue to be supported for a long time -- presumably for those running older hardware.
That's great ... he knows what he's doing (as usual)
I have a ibm think pad 350 it's a 25Mhz 486SX with 16Mb ram 250 MB HDD running slack4.0
nobody who sees it run can beleve it's a 25Mhz machine for as old as it is it's still pretty livly
I have a ibm think pad 350 it's a 25Mhz 486SX with 16Mb ram 250 MB HDD running slack4.0 nobody who sees it run can believe it's a 25Mhz machine for as old as it is it's still pretty lively
Now THAT's pretty amazing.
Do you have a network connection for it? What software do you run on it?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.