SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My main computer (HP Pavilion 510n) only allows 512 meg ram.
I've never built a kernel for Slackware.
I'm running 13.0 :
2.6.29.6 #1 Mon Dec 7 16:34:06 CST 2009 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(TM)CPU 1200MHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Would there be any advantage to build a new kernel for 512 megs ram maximum? I do basic stuff with this: browse, email, video clips, music...
Turning off the highmem support (I think the first of the 3 settings allows for upto 1GB RAM - if I remember rightly) will also save you a tiny bit of overhead on page translations, but I doubt you'd notice it. It all adds up though. On a machine with limited resources like that, it's probably worth fine tuning a kernel config. A little bit here and a little bit there can add up. Just don't expect miracles.
Besides, if you've not done it before then it's worth doing for the learning experience.
Thanks guys.
I'll at least start reading Alien Bob's page about building a new kernel.
I didn't mention that I use IceWM, which helps, but I use firefox and sometimes thunderbird.
I use thunderbird at times and then use mutt at times, which helps also.
Man I remember when only expensive computers had 512mb
I used to run Slackware with KDE 3.x (10.0/11.0) on a PC with around 160mb RAM, it was fine
Even on a 64mb machine it was OK, if you weren't doing too much (firefox = bad for memory)
Don't know about KDE 4.x mem usage, you should be fine with 3.x, even with 4.x it should be ok
I doubt you'll see much difference with a custom kernel, but it could save a few MB if you leave out drivers you don't need and such. EG when I tried loading Slackware 12.2 onto a 64mb machine, all the included kernels on the boot CD ran out of memory (these were the huge kernels, mind you)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.