LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat
User Name
Password
Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-28-2004, 12:30 PM   #1
guest22
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
broken rh9 in 1950r (raid-5, dual-p3, 512M memory)...used to work better than this


I have an issue similar to some other's I've seen but still getting nowhere, albeit with a few tantalizing clues:

I have an 1850R, RH9 (dual-600M Pentium ///, 512M memory, Raid5 configured at hardware with a "Smart" controller board). I found out about the install issues the hard way, and was able to load the system with a "nousb" and mem-256M. But now it just doesn't work after install. I've probably tried it 12 times to date. Along the way, I upgraded to the lastest ROM for both the system and for the disk controller board - which certainly sped up the entire system a lot until it bombed (it was bombing under the older firmware as well).

Quick background: I used to have RH8 going on the machine, and while it would once in a while flake out it was at least usable (it was not used for anything remotely close to critical until now). But when I tried re-installing RH8, it wouldn't work either, so I took the opportunity to drag out some RH9 cds as long as I wasn't getting anywhere anyway.

I finally got around to manually partitioning the standard recommended partitions manually through fdisk and tried doing an mke2fs on the newly created partitions. Here's where I stared noticing the funky interactions. It does appear to be some sort of a speed issue vs. memory issue for a large chunk of data writing. It's like the kernel is pumping out data too fast for the controller to keep up and doesn't interact with the controller correctly to know when to pause.

Formatting a short parition such as /boot is just fine (and swap). Formatting / starts off just fine, until various behaviors such as kernal panics or just plain lockups without the panic happens (I have had problems even with no hyper-threading, and even booting from the single-processor option that is set up).

Both memory and the Raid controller pass diagnostics, although that may or not mean anything as I bet the kernel is stressing things much more than the diagnostics. And I have the system type set to Linux through SmartStart.

I have seen posts that says there are incompatibilities with later kernels and this hardware, but then others have said they're running it just fine. And it seems that later kernels should have learned from various hardware out there and while this is an antiquated setup, it was reputable in its day.

Anybody have any clues?

Thanks!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suse 10 Live DVD boot - Out of Memory on Tecra 8100/512M DFossmeister SUSE / openSUSE 0 11-02-2005 07:23 PM
RAID: when will broken hard drive be noticed? hamish Linux - Software 1 09-04-2005 10:30 PM
Raid array broken RedHat 7.2 salscozzari Linux - General 2 06-29-2005 09:40 PM
Broken Pipe error with rpmbuild in rh9 tuxfood Red Hat 1 05-21-2005 04:30 PM
RAID 1 ... everyime I reboot, /dev/md0 is broken... rrohde Red Hat 1 10-26-2004 02:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration