If you change the NF variable, you would probably simply drop the remaining fields.
I think different versions of awk behave differently when you change the NR variable. Especially if you increase it.
You could loop a variable from 1 to N*N and perform a modulas test ( NF % index ). If the result is zero, print \n.
Code:
echo >testfile {1..49}
~> echo >>testfile {1..36}
~> echo >>testfile {1..100}
~> awk 'BEGIN {ORS=" "}{ for (i=0; i<= NF; i++) {
if ((i%sqrt(NF) )==0) printf "\n"
print $(i+1)
}}' testfile
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 32 33 34 35
36 37 38 39 40 41 42
43 44 45 46 47 48 49
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
I would have moved the sqrt() before the loop, but I was working interactively, which makes editing harder.
Code:
awk 'BEGIN {ORS=" "}{ dim=sqrt(NF)
for (i=0; i<= NF; i++) {
if ((i%dim )==0) printf "\n"
print $(i+1)
}}' testfile
A test may be needed in case NF == 0, to avoid a division by zero error.