LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Just my opinion but I think something like that would set a bad precedent.
Good reasoning.
But isn't there some way to concentrate and keep all those (actually just 1) discussions in one place for me to ignore? Let's say: One thread? You could name it: “My candidate is good, yours sucks” and everybody would immediately be informed.
Take each one of theses topics and imagine that they put a precedent for the discussion of all the important elections that I am aware of. Felicitations. Worlds in the rear-view mirror may be bigger than they appear.
Keep in mind you can permanently exclude fora from your search, so if you don't want to see the content in General it is very easy to avoid.
--jeremy
Jeremy, thank you for your support.
Because, why would I block the General forum, as there are plenty of good threads in General. Your backup is appreciated.
Keep in mind you can permanently exclude fora from your search, so if you don't want to see the content in General it is very easy to avoid.
I think for any forum we need to be judicious in what we subscribe to or choose to react too. A big concern I have about entirely avoiding the NON-NIX->General forum is that some members post their actual technical questions there. My reading of tea leaves is because they tend to post in that forum a lot, hence they post all new threads in there. Still, if a question is a legitimate Linux technical one, I feel the thread should be moved, and am rapidly adopting the stance that I'll use the Report button to request a thread be moved from that non-technical forum to a correct place. Meanwhile I feel we do still see mis-placed questions even in the technical forums, just that they live a far briefer lifespan or they get moved to General quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan
No, the whole point of this forum is that stuff that's posted here stays here.
And I know for sure that people behave differently when they know that what they write will disappear permanently after a set shelf-life.
The first part was my thoughts exactly, and I fully agree with the second part about human behavior.
There are plenty of places to discuss politics where such discussions are the purpose of said places.
There's a reason I try--not always successfully--to avoid the occasional political thread here at LQ. I spend my days with politics; I prefer to spend my evenings with something that makes sense.
It is one thing to tolerate occasional political discussions.
It would be quite another to encourage them. And attempting to quarantine them would be futile and likely counterproductive.
Afterthought:
I do understand why persons who might consider LQ their "online home" would want to discuss parochial political issues at their online home. (As LQ is an international forum, discussing local US politics is ipso facto parochial.) I also must note that the political threads could set a good example for the general discourse, as they are generally civilized in nature.
And, as an "online home," it beats Facebook and Twitter three ways to Sunday.
Linux Forums excludes both politics and religion, presumably to avoid rancour. There's a Coffee Lounge for general discussions, but not about those two subjects.
This forum seems to have done a pretty good job corralling religious discussion into one megathread without having to create a subforum for it. Perhaps politics could be treated in the same way.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.