Linuxquestions.org incorrectly says I've posted, but haven't...
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Fedora 12, Arch Linux (updated daily =D)
Posts: 270
Rep:
Linuxquestions.org incorrectly says I've posted, but haven't...
Hello! I have a very minor problem that's really not more than a slight nuisance. Whenever I start a thread, when it has no replies, and I go to check my subscribed threads the next day, I see that the title is bold sometimes, and it says the last post was at an absurd time (2:33 AM, for example) but I in fact only posted the first post on the thread because I started it, and far earlier (3 days, usually) and at a more reasonable time than it says.
I think the following is happening:
LQ "auto bumps" zero-reply threads for three days. So it gets a status of "It's "new", it's unread, it should be at the top of the list, somebody read it and reply to it" (so don't bump your own thread - many people regularly review the zero-reply threads)
.
If the time is wrong, it may be because you haven't logged in.
If this doesn't answer your Q's, ask for this thread to be moved to "LQ Suggestions & Feedback" where Jeremy may be able to help.
I think the following is happening:
LQ "auto bumps" zero-reply threads for three days. So it gets a status of "It's "new", it's unread, it should be at the top of the list, somebody read it and reply to it" (so don't bump your own thread - many people regularly review the zero-reply threads).
Thanks for the explanation. I have observed many times what the OP asked about (usually with other people's posts) and have just scratched my head. I was unaware of the autobump feature.
Quote:
If the time is wrong, it may be because you haven't logged in.
Although I am completely baffled about what you are trying to say here.
If the time is wrong, it may be because you haven't logged in..... to LQ:
Posting times are adjusted to your local time, but only if you have logged in to LQ - Otherwise LQ doesn't know who, or where you are, and you'll get LQ's local time displayed instead.
When you are logged in the time function checks the setting in your profile and adjusts the time shown to be your own timezone. If you are not logged in, the time shown is LQ time, which is Buffalo time, IIRC.
Thnaks for the explanations about the fact that logging in customizes the time for your time zone. Looking for something difficult and subtle, I missed the obvious!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.