Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi, let's say we want to update Red Hat 6 packages on our servers on a private corporate network. Ansible is a good way to to this. We would have a yml file that has a line that says
yum: update=latest
and a host file with a list of servers to update.
My question is, where are these packages coming from? If it's from Red Hat, is this secure? What about satellite server - do we still need this? Is this free now -- used to be $$$.
What solutions do you have at your organizations for "patch management"?
The patches are build by Red Hat.
These patches are synchronized to the mirror servers.
It is a good idea to download the patches from a nearby and fast server.
It is a good idea to setup a local mirror server in your network.
This saves download volume and is faster.
Then the servers can download the patches from the local mirror server.
Because anything being pushed over the Internet is subject to tampering and intrusion. That's why you have a local repository of packages - security. If the push is encrypted, you're better off.
Because anything being pushed over the Internet is subject to tampering and intrusion. That's why you have a local repository of packages - security. If the push is encrypted, you're better off.
If you can verify the package signature, why the package should be encrypted if it doesn't contain secret data?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.