Comparison between Linux server and Windows server
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm no expert, but I think it depends. What types of servers (mail, file, web, print, etc)? Some of it depends on the environment into which you're introducing the servers and what its role is. In my limited experience, I feel like it's easier to secure a linux server against outside intrusion and typically there hasn't been as much maintenance or downtown than when I've used windows servers.
But in an all windows environment, having windows servers can make sense. It also depends on client needs -- capital cost they can spend, application stack needed, etc.
If you _had_ to have Exchange, or 2k3 AD environment... I wouldn't recommend Linux - and by Exchange, I mean Exchange, not "a pop/smtp program". Also some of the .NET framework and functionality that comes with it would require web servers running Windows (the Mono Project is making great strides tho).
In the server world... for the most part Linux is better (imo) - unless you have to have M$ Proprietary software and couldn't find FOSS alternatives.
Advantages for linux server
LAMP is a big one. for websites php mysql etc. all rolled into 1. Certain distros actually have it with a gui and all u have to do is fill in the blanks. No rebooting everytime there is an update.
ftp server is easy with gproftpd.
Disadvantages of Linux.
It can be complicated to configure apache if your using it in linux. issues with front page extensions.
Advantages of windows server. Very gui oriented, click and type for ftp www.
Disadvantages of windows server.
1. $$$$$$$$$$
2. if you dont use IIS LOCKDOWN you will get hacked just a matter of time. permissions permissions permissions.
this is just my 2 cents. i have a few simple websites going 1 for work and 1 for home.
run my own ftp server for home to backup stuff.
I think active directory or novell edirectory needs to be used for a windows domain rather than using samba because samba just doesnt quite cut it compared to edirectory or active directory.
However I believe Linux Excels on the web because the web is suited to be free and open-source. As for exchange there are many linux alternatives that are better including the best Zimbra. As for cost i would still rather pick a linux RHEL Server over a Win2k3 for DNS, FTP, Mail and Web services even if they were priced the same.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.