LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2006, 08:05 AM   #1
depam
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 861

Rep: Reputation: 30
Network Administration comparison of Windows 2003 Server and Linux


Hi!

I've recently been hired as a Network/Systems Administrator. The problem is that I am very passionate in Linux and that all of their systems are running under Windows. Honestly speaking, I have been dealing with network administration in Linux in almost 2 years on my IT career. Can someone provide me a comparison on networking administration of the two OSes? I mean can I easilly configure Windows OS? Someone told me that since Linux/UNIX is far difficult than Windows OS, it will be easy to use Windows since it is just a point-and-click administration. How true is this? But someone told me and I think I would have to agree that Linux/UNIX is far stable than Windows. Can you provide me some points on this? I will try to introduce to them the power of Open Source but not now. In this situation, where do I start so I can convince them? Thanks.
 
Old 11-17-2006, 08:21 AM   #2
odcheck
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Debian
Posts: 978

Rep: Reputation: 31
Start with is Apache form Microsoft or from ...
or is LDAP from Microsoft or from...

and so on.
 
Old 11-17-2006, 08:32 AM   #3
amitsharma_26
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: New delhi
Distribution: RHEL 3.0/4.0
Posts: 777

Rep: Reputation: 31
Honestly speaking, I have been dealing with network administration in Linux in almost 2 years on my IT career. Can someone provide me a comparison on networking administration of the two OSes?
As ya wordings, you sound a newbie for a MS environment.

I mean can I easilly configure Windows OS? Someone told me that since Linux/UNIX is far difficult than Windows OS, it will be easy to use Windows since it is just a point-and-click administration.
I still do not understand that even after having a 2 years of net administration in linux; Why dont you have any confidence abt it. Look you are still listening to others about it(on account of someone told me....). And about MS; You got to use your brains as well before doing this mere point-&-click administration.

How true is this? But someone told me and I think I would have to agree that Linux/UNIX is far stable than Windows.

On stability; I give a yes to it.

Last edited by amitsharma_26; 11-19-2006 at 06:45 AM.
 
Old 11-17-2006, 10:49 PM   #4
depam
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 861

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Okay guys. Can you just give me a pointers for starter in MS like me? I am used to configuring using the shell but the approach in MS is totally different. Hope someone can give me pointers on where to start.
 
Old 11-18-2006, 01:10 AM   #5
Micro420
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986

Rep: Reputation: 45
I use both Windows Server 2003 and a Linux server at my work. It really depends on what your needs are. If it's just basic group memberships, file sharing, print server, and the sorts, then Linux works fine for that and you don't have to pay for the licenses and fees. However, if your job requires things like Terminal Services, Active Directory, and software that require Windows Server 2003, then go with Windows Server OS. I personally find the Windows Server OS easier to use because it's all point-and-click.

A good place to start with Windows Server 2003 is the CONFIGURE YOUR SERVER wizard. That sets up everything. Active Directory, file sharing, printer server, DNS, DHCP, Routing and Remote Access, POP, etc...

Last edited by Micro420; 11-18-2006 at 01:13 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Making Redhat Linux server work with Windows Server 2000 & 2003 vietdiesel Linux - Newbie 1 04-28-2006 12:36 AM
Suse Linux 9 vs Windows 2003 server Billy McE Linux - Networking 1 10-27-2005 06:27 PM
Red Hat Linux 9 + Windows Server 2003 + Windows XP + Fedora in same domain wolfy339 Linux - Networking 5 03-02-2005 06:03 AM
Linux Client to Windows 2003 Network. Help rpdalton Linux - Networking 2 02-19-2004 11:01 PM
XP Professional + Linux + Windows Server 2003 ? slice4e Linux - Newbie 3 08-30-2003 09:39 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration