Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have Debian Jessie 8.7 and as i see there is new release of Debian 8.8. How to upgrade my 8.7 to new one? Should i install again system or what? Please help me. Thanks in advanced. any support will be great appreciated.
Previously, the initial release had r0 appended, but normally omitted: for example Debian Etch started off as 4.0r0. Point Releases increment the digit after the "r" to specify a certain revision of a release with updates included.
At Lenny's first point release, this scheme changed. A micro version number was used to indicate a point release (e.g. 5.0.1). 1
At Wheezy's first point release, this scheme changed. The minor version number is now used to indicate a point release (e.g. 7.1).23
I'd recommend staying up-to-date really, so if there are a lot of updates then I'd make sure to update it all. Unless it is an enterprise system and having an application fail needs to be carefully managed, then it shouldn't be a big issue.
Last edited by r3sistance; 05-23-2017 at 07:22 AM.
That link has a bit misleading info about apt-get dist-upgrade, It is not usually used to upgrade from one release to other, but rather to handle situations when dependencies must be resolved in a way that will remove some packages, or install new ones. That often happens in cases of new linux kernels, xorg updates and stuff like that. Also, apt-get and friends like apt-cache and others are not just old, they are well used and well tested and very well documented. Many refuse to use newish apt, for various reasons. Those that prefer tools with some advance things that you might, or might not need, often end up using aptitude. Those that want to avoid command line, go for synaptic. Anyway, to find more of these tools, man apt-get and man apt-cache are your friend. As for examples of how to use them for various things, net is full of tutorials that quick search will provide.
If you just upgrade the packages it should stay up to date. Dist upgrade is for when testing drops down to stable.
If you by dist upgrade refer to apt-get dist-upgrade, while it will be used in that case for sure, that is not quite true. Read my previous post, or even better, read manuals. There are upgrades in stable that might require apt-get dist-upgrade.
If you by dist upgrade refer to apt-get dist-upgrade, while it will be used in that case for sure, that is not quite true. Read my previous post, or even better, read manuals. There are upgrades in stable that might require apt-get dist-upgrade.
It would be very unusual to need a dist-upgrade (or aptitude full-upgrade)to upgrade packages on a stable system.
Much more likely on testing/sid for transitions between major versions of upstream software or changes in packaging protocols for a given software.
It would be very unusual to need a dist-upgrade (or aptitude full-upgrade)to upgrade packages on a stable system.
Much more likely on testing/sid for transitions between major versions of upstream software or changes in packaging protocols for a given software.
Unusual on stable yes, but that it is because Debian stable is very, very much stable and tested. It still can happen though. As for use on testing/unstable yes, but it is not quite just because of transition and changes of protocols, but rather because of changes in dependencies of packages. Like in cases when it must remove some packages, or to add new ones to solve dependencies. Anyway, point of my posts was not to get OP confused by name of dist-upgrade and to explain that it is not command that will get him to new distribution release, but rather keep his current one up to date, in case of need.
Thanks friends for your kind supports, i appreciate that. I will do as you provided me and will inform when i be at home, i am out of city at the moment. Thanks friends.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.