LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2018, 12:42 PM   #16
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine View Post
qjoypad 4.1.0 is in the Ubuntu repositories. You can install it with a couple of mouse clicks in the Ubuntu Software Center, or with the following terminal command. Easy-peasy. Hope that helps.

Code:
sudo apt install qjoypad
Good call.
 
Old 09-25-2018, 01:31 PM   #17
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiatr View Post
Code:
bash: ./config: There is no such file or directory
to point out.
configure is not config you're missing letters here
 
Old 09-25-2018, 02:04 PM   #18
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
As snowpine has suggested......
Just go ahead and have apt install qjoypad for you.

In the future check your package manager to see if the pkg you want is available before having to build from src.
 
Old 09-25-2018, 02:06 PM   #19
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrurga View Post
Good call.
A good call indeed.

It's much easier to let APT do it's job:-
 
Old 09-25-2018, 05:17 PM   #20
zeebra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,833
Blog Entries: 17

Rep: Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne View Post
Sorry, it can only be one of two things:
  • The filename is wrong
  • The directory is wrong
A better question is, what software are you trying to install, and why aren't you installing it through your software/package manager?
That question is irrelevant as far as I can understand. Installing packages from source is everyones right.
Other than that you should be correct. Those two reasons are pretty much the only ones, unless the file is corrupt in some weird way.

Am I old fashion for using tar -zxvf?

Last edited by zeebra; 09-25-2018 at 05:21 PM.
 
Old 09-25-2018, 06:13 PM   #21
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
just untar how ever it gets done, cd into dir, ls to see what files are in there, find the file you need to run, configure not config, or automake.sh to create a configure file, or MakeFile
then if MakeFile then run

make
sudo make install

else

run one of the others,

automake.sh then configure, then make, then sudo make install,

or configure, make, sudo make install.



simple as that, providing you have your depends developer headers installed, which is a topic for another day.

./ for in directory

Last edited by BW-userx; 09-25-2018 at 06:19 PM.
 
Old 09-26-2018, 07:52 AM   #22
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,685

Rep: Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeebra View Post
That question is irrelevant as far as I can understand. Installing packages from source is everyones right. Other than that you should be correct. Those two reasons are pretty much the only ones, unless the file is corrupt in some weird way.

Am I old fashion for using tar -zxvf?
Not a bit, and they can do whatever they want. However, based on the post, this seems to be a new user, so installing from source probably isn't the best idea. And (to me), unless you need a brand-new, bleeding edge feature/bugfix, there's little need to install from source. System updates and later administration is far easier with packages. Bear in mind, I'm not saying you SHOULD NEVER install from source, but for a new user who has an existing package? Don't think it's a good idea.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-26-2018, 08:16 AM   #23
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,883
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
And based on the way the OP phrased their disjointed questions, I have to agree that recommending they install using a package manager is a great idea.

TB0ne's question also was a very early reply and we had yet to learn what the OP was trying to really do.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-26-2018, 08:35 AM   #24
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeebra View Post
That question is irrelevant as far as I can understand. Installing packages from source is everyones right.
I agree 100%.

However, if a new friend is coming over to my house for the first time, and they ask, "How do I get in? The window is stuck!" it would be reasonable for me to reply, "Walk on in through the front door; it's open!"

Last edited by snowday; 09-26-2018 at 08:36 AM.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2018, 03:41 AM   #25
zeebra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,833
Blog Entries: 17

Rep: Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640Reputation: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine View Post
I agree 100%.

However, if a new friend is coming over to my house for the first time, and they ask, "How do I get in? The window is stuck!" it would be reasonable for me to reply, "Walk on in through the front door; it's open!"
Haha, very true. But I think it is useful for people who are new to GNU/Linux to do things in a non-ubuntu way. Doing things the Ubuntu way they will never learn anything.

Ofcourse there is a balance between using packages and source, but I think source use should be encouraged, also for newbies, so they can learn about what they are actually doing. If you get too comfortable only using a package manager, that is what you will always do. It can be compared to someone in the GNU/Linux world who only uses a GUI. I mean, the tremendous power of using GNU/Linux really becomes visible when you use the CLI.

Perhaps it is the times, not sure. When I learned GNU/Linux there was no package management (although they probably existed), and everything I installed was from source.
 
Old 09-27-2018, 06:16 AM   #26
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
I usually keep it to if it is not in the repo then go to source and install from there.
if the repo version is lesser then the source, remove the repo version install the source.

depending on what it is, in its complexity to install and configure it. Some stable releases if not all are too / or turn into outdated releases too soon for some of the apps running.


why keep the old version in the repo when upgraded app can still run without error on an old kernel and the frame work that is needed to just run it. go to source.

this, newbieie shouldn't do this or shouldn't do that, because he or she is a newbeie got a stop. they got to learn sometime, and they of all people should know what they are capable of learning of and doing, and how to find out.

as far as Ubuntutututu I found that it is too much Winux for me.

Last edited by BW-userx; 09-27-2018 at 06:28 AM.
 
Old 09-27-2018, 06:56 AM   #27
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,685

Rep: Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972Reputation: 7972
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeebra View Post
Haha, very true. But I think it is useful for people who are new to GNU/Linux to do things in a non-ubuntu way. Doing things the Ubuntu way they will never learn anything.

Of course there is a balance between using packages and source, but I think source use should be encouraged, also for newbies, so they can learn about what they are actually doing. If you get too comfortable only using a package manager, that is what you will always do. It can be compared to someone in the GNU/Linux world who only uses a GUI. I mean, the tremendous power of using GNU/Linux really becomes visible when you use the CLI.

Perhaps it is the times, not sure. When I learned GNU/Linux there was no package management (although they probably existed), and everything I installed was from source.
While I don't disagree in principal, there's a time for this. If a new user can't change directories...is building from source going to be a good thing for them at this point? And add to that the fact that each package may install differently (./config? ./configure? automake? cmake?), and a new user is going to be lost pretty quickly.

They've got to walk before they run. And unless I absolutely NEED the latest-and-greatest feature/bugfix, I'd much rather install via package and update manager, vs. source. I've got quite enough to take care of.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2018, 02:17 PM   #28
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Wiatr:

Have you been able to get qjoypad installed?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to install tar.gz & tar.bz2 file on Linux min Krishnendu Linux Mint 2 07-16-2009 06:52 AM
BackUp & Restore with TAR (.tar / .tar.gz / .tar.bz2 / tar.Z) asgarcymed Linux - General 5 12-31-2006 02:53 AM
How to INSTALL softwares with *.tar.gz or *.tar.tgz extension On SLACKWARE 10.2 DdOs Linux - Software 4 03-20-2006 01:54 AM
how to install .tar.bz and src.rpms and tar.gz files gadekishore Linux - Software 1 10-12-2005 08:09 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration