Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm not sure why Lubuntu is using 90 percent of the CPU.
Are you sure it's the GPU?
What does htop show?
Quote:
I tried using nouveau and proprietary driver and there is no difference between them. Lubuntu can't make good use of GPU.
If you can't play 1080p check your resolution settings.
Do some research to find out why. And, while your at it maybe run dmesg to find out what is going on. Check the driver and see if that throws any errors.
Most likely, the post was held back for review from one of the moderators to ensure that it complied with LQ guidelines. That is standard procedure for first time posters here.
I am testing GT710. On win7 (sorry for this word on linux forum ) everything is fine and smooth.
On lubuntu... with the same graphics card 720p eats 90% of the CPU power; I can't play 1080p. Why is that so? Why does linux put rendering graphics/HD content down to CPU?
because the proprietary driver doesn't work?
please post output of
Hi, I have tested GT 710, Radeon HD6400, and perhaps GT 240 (within next week).
I am testing it on an Intel DG31PR with Xeon x5450 (mod).
Driver in use: nouveau. Display: Panasonic (TV) 22" 1920x1080p.
Graphic temperature: 52.5 C ~ acceptable (I am living in a tropical country, no aircon in the living room).
Everything seems fine, CPU load while writing this article: ~1.1%.
If power consumption is a concern, ditch the 10yo+ computer. Spend $60 on the asus tinker board, or other options like a minnowboard (x86 based). Which should have specs comparable to your current machine. For $200 you could get something like an hp stream 11 or more modern options like an azulle byte plus. Just saying that it's probably not worth the $100-ish or more for a GPU when you could get entire systems more capable by modern standards. Which use a fraction of the power and puts off almost no heat. You'll save tens of dollars a month on the A/C you didn't have to run. And it'll pay for itself from a certain point of view.
everything seems to be in order.
the proprietary nvidia driver is up and running afaics.
maybe you need some hardware video accel or some opengl magic. this is a little out of my comfort zone though.
I didn't buy a brand new graphics card to have the same crap as I had before. This is not the card that bears the blame. I am so angry.
@ondoho
But... there is the light at the end of the tunnel. After hours of browsing on the Internet I tried Chromium. And you know what... I can play 1080p on Chromium. Looks like I have to stick to Chromium, don't I? However, I am still not happy with CPU workload. On Chromium it is about 50%. In comparison to wiodnws sieben it is about 10%.
If you have an idea on how to solve the problem on ff don't hesitate to write.
@ondoho
But... there is the light at the end of the tunnel. After hours of browsing on the Internet I tried Chromium. And you know what... I can play 1080p on Chromium. Looks like I have to stick to Chromium, don't I? However, I am still not happy with CPU workload. On Chromium it is about 50%. In comparison to wiodnws sieben it is about 10%.
If you have an idea on how to solve the problem on ff don't hesitate to write.
conclusion: ff browser bears the blame
why would you use a browser at all to blayback video.
anyhow, your experience points to hardware accelaration problems, and yes, firefox is known to have problems with that (at least on linux).
why not just load your video links into mpv with youtube-dl.
I was faced with the same situation, so cool that I did not bother and went, smoked a cigarette and chewed a delicious big mac) but seriously, I do not see the point in spending $ and time on the old stuff, only if not for fun, and socool.sg . I do not see a better solution to this problem, all are good. The other day I will install a video card on an old laptop, but I haven't decided which one is better yet. Perhaps it will be possible to replace the processor and I will write or here my successes or create a new thread. Dudes really have a lot of useful comments, thank you for your opinion. Take care of yourself and your devices ) I'm going to watch a movie about hackers, I love it.
Its always proved capable of 1920 x 1080p via HDMI, in anything - firefox included.
Quite capable of handling full screen HD video, even though it only cost about £30.
I don't know what you would get via the VGA connection.
It's funny, so many people start this kind of thread (help! how can I play YT videos on my matured laptop!) over the years, and they don't really change much at all. (something to be said for searching before posting)
I thought this was something I'd replied to yesterday, not 3 years ago.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.