Linux - Kernel This forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
03-31-2008, 08:16 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Rep:
|
bad block management
Hello,
At file system(udf disk based) level i need to implement bad block manager. Plz give me some approches, or let me how this implemented in other file systems
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 11:15 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu, CentOS
Posts: 585
Rep:
|
|
|
|
04-01-2008, 11:30 AM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,417
|
Moved: This thread is more suitable in the kernel forum and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves. Please note posting duplicate threads is against the LQ Rules so don't do that. Please read the LQ Rules before continuing. Instead use the report button to ask moderators to move your thread to the forum of your choice. Finally *do* respond to replies made, you left your previous thread unanswered which doesn't help anyone.
|
|
|
04-02-2008, 01:30 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Sorry. By mistake i had sent in another forum.
Thanks for moving it to proper forum
|
|
|
04-03-2008, 07:38 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 11,311
|
As the article cited (and many others) note, the general approach is to use hardware-RAID, and then on top of that to use a logical-volume approach which introduces the notion of "storage pools" instead of physical drives. This gives rise to, among other things, the very curiously-named SAN (Storage Area Network), which is a self-managing hardware device specifically dedicated to storage. A less expensive but also less-sophisticated technology is NAS (Network Attached Storage), which more-directly exposes "only its drives."
"Bad blocks," therefore, are dealt-with by avoidance. Run-of-the-mill disk drives support an internal self-test mechanism known as "SMART," which Linux gives direct access to and which storage devices also exploit. A drive that judges itself "pending failure" is retired and taken off-line by the storage controller ahead of time.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|