LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2006, 02:28 PM   #1
ziox
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: RedHat, Fedora, Suse, Debian, Gentoo, Mandrake
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 15
RAID 1 on SATA "RedHat 4"


Hi
I got a problem while and after installing RHEL4 update3
tiring to install RAID1 on SATA hard drives
250 G each
'it boots looks ok but'
when I do fdisk -l
I always get a massage like that

#======================================================
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 32 257008+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda2 33 7681 61440592+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda3 7682 12780 40957717+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda4 12781 30401 141540682+ 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 12781 16604 30716248+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda6 16605 18516 15358108+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda7 18517 19791 10241406 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda8 19792 20052 2096451 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda9 20053 30401 83128311 fd Linux raid autodetect

Disk /dev/sdb: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 32 257008+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb2 33 7681 61440592+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb3 7682 12780 40957717+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb4 12781 30401 141540682+ 5 Extended
/dev/sdb5 12781 16604 30716248+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb6 16605 18516 15358108+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb7 18517 19791 10241406 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb8 19792 20052 2096451 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb9 20053 30401 83128311 fd Linux raid autodetect

#======================================================
Disk /dev/mdN: 62.9 GB, 62915084288 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 15360128 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes

Disk /dev/mdN doesn't contain a valid partition table

#======================================================
and the output of mdadm -D /dev/mdN
/dev/mdN:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Tue Jun 20 13:43:49 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 10241280 (9.77 GiB 10.49 GB)
Device Size : 10241280 (9.77 GiB 10.49 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Tue Jun 20 14:55:57 2006
State : dirty
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0


Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 7 0 active sync /dev/sdaN
1 8 23 1 active sync /dev/sdbN
UUID : f55241be:4580603f:a0abab71:2685099e
Events : 0.16
#=======================================================
and /etc/fstab look like that
# This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details
/dev/md3 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/md0 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/md2 /home ext3 defaults 1 2
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/md5 /servers ext3 defaults 1 2
none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
/dev/md6 /tmp ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/md1 /usr ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/md4 /var ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/md7 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hdc /media/cdrom auto pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:.object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
#==============================================================
So should I to worry about this message
"Disk /dev/mdN doesn't contain a valid partition tabble" or not?
#==============================================================
Thanks
 
Old 06-21-2006, 11:41 AM   #2
WhatsHisName
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: /earth/usa/nj (UTC-5)
Distribution: RHEL, AltimaLinux, Rocky
Posts: 1,151

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Disk /dev/mdN doesn't contain a valid partition table
Unless you specified a partitionable array using “mdadm -C --auto ...”, then a non-partitionable array was created by default.

The fdisk message just confirms the presence of a non-partitionable array.
 
Old 06-23-2006, 07:47 PM   #3
ziox
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: RedHat, Fedora, Suse, Debian, Gentoo, Mandrake
Posts: 132

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks a lot
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why don't want load Linux on " IT 8212F "RAID" card? master_boy Linux - Hardware 8 12-26-2005 09:56 AM
Dell "CERC" Raid-5 w/CENT OS. Is this true hardware RAID or just an expensive card? fireman949 Linux - Hardware 2 06-24-2005 05:44 PM
[Redhat] make "admin" account same privledges as "root" Bi0haZarD Linux - Networking 20 01-12-2005 10:47 AM
SATA RAID 1 "Mirror"Gnome reads combined size OkiTek Linux - Hardware 0 12-01-2004 12:21 PM
redhat 9 frustration....... :/ "krb5-libs" and "openssl" DraaX Linux - Newbie 3 07-25-2003 05:40 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration