Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have been saving some money to buy a video card, but all I can afford right now is a Geforce FX5200 (128MB) or a MX4000 (128MB). Now, I've been reading lots of reviews about these cards and found out that they're only crap. Is this really true for linux users on a budget? I also read that the MX4000 card is slightly better than the FX5200. Please, give me some advice on which one to buy: the FX5200 or the cheaper MX4000. I intend to run cedega-games, like Max Payne 2 and native ones like NWN, UT, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, etc.
Can't really vouch for either, but I have an FX5200 256MB in my box(athlon XP 2600+, 512 MB DRR333).
And I get excellent performance out of it on Arch, SUSE, and Slackware...
The MX I have around is my Mom's computer who I maintain, which has a geforce 2 MX400 64MB... it works well for what it is.. but obviously doesn't compare well.
Anything nvidia should give you plenty of performance. My fx5200 was only like $70 at Sam's Club.
So your recommendation is to buy the newer FX5200 (only 128MB though)?
The only thing that makes me hesitate on this topic is the fact that the MX4000's GPU core is faster than the FX5000's. And also because of the reviews.
I would say that you would be happy with either of them. If you are leaning towards the MX more, get it. I like my FX, but it wasn't really a conscious decision to go with that model. I wanted a better card that was better supported under Linux(I had an ATI All-In-Wonder 128MB) and I found this fx5200 with 256MB... it was cheap, it was nvidia, it was available.. so I bought it.
I'm sure that you will be pleased with either. The decision must be your own.
I liked your answer, it was very "Matrixish"!
Ok, I guess I'll investigate a little more, and then buy the MX4000. As I said, the only reason to choose this one is the GPU core frequency.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.