Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
07-17-2019, 11:58 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2019
Posts: 155
Rep: 
|
dell poweredge 1950
Please tell me how to see which raid is installed on the server hardware or fakeraid?
Code:
01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 1078 (rev 04)
|
|
|
07-17-2019, 12:22 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, CoreOS, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 7,831
|
LSI was the OEM for Dell's PERC (Power Edge Raid Controllers). It is a "hardware" controller that allows you to setup RAID sets. It is "hardware" RAID vs "fake" raid in that what it presents to the OS as a disk is a RAID set rather than the underlying members of that RAID set. i.e. If you had 2 disks in RAID1 in LSI/PERC you'd only see 1 disk in the OS. If you had 2 disks in a RAID1 and 4 disks in a RAID5 you see 2 disks in the OS - one being the RAID1 virtual disk and the other being the RAID5 virtual disk.
MegaRAID SAS is the Linux kernel driver for LSI/PERC cards with SAS drives.
If you install the lsscsi package then run the lsscsi command it should show which "disk" at OS is associated with the LSI/PERC.
You can see the exact config on your LSI/PERC if you hit Ctrl-M during a reboot when prompted to do so during POST.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-17-2019, 03:51 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
" if you hit Ctrl-M during a reboot when prompted to do so during POST."
At boot up you should but not always see what looks like two bios's. One being the computer bios and the second would be the way to access a real hardware raid card. Every one I've ever seen has some hot key to configure the drives and raid array. Things like tests and other features are found there too.
This may present a collection of physical disks to the OS as a single drive (and you usually want that).
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-18-2019, 05:11 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2019
Posts: 155
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
we were able to configure the disks. put 2 SSDs on 16 gigs in raid0. initialized the array. A single root partition with an ext2 file system has been created without a separately assigned boot loader. gentoo is installed. but the Linux kernel goes immediately to reboot.
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 08:15 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, CoreOS, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 7,831
|
RAID0 has no redundancy. If either disk fails you're going to lose data.
Why ext2 rather than ext4 or another modern filesystem?
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-18-2019, 01:19 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2019
Posts: 155
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Well, I have one section .... ext2 is desirable for starting the kernel. so I just took and formatted the entire section at once in ext2.
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 01:48 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, CoreOS, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 7,831
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slcklnx
Well, I have one section .... ext2 is desirable for starting the kernel. so I just took and formatted the entire section at once in ext2.
|
/boot (where the kernel lives) runs fine on ext4 which is a journaled extension of the old ext2. If you have recoverable filesystem errors the journal will save your bacon. If your distro is so old it doesn't support ext4 you'd be better off with ext3. ext4 has significant performance improvements over ext3 which is why I recommend you use that if at all possible.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|