Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In short, it is illegal for a computer manufacturer, or indeed any manufacturer, to sell you a product you do not want.
Imagine that you're buying a car...
You: Hello, I'd like to buy this car please.
Dealer: Certainly sir, that's 100 fish with the stereo or 150 fish with the big stereo.
You: I don't want a stereo, thanks.
Dealer: Fine sir, that'll be 100 fish please.
You: So is the smaller stereo free?
Dealer: Oh no Sir, but we'll charge you 100 fish anyway.
You: I actually have my own stereo that I'll install myself.
Dealer: Yes, sir, but we can't sell you a car without a stereo made a Melkosurf.
You: Actually, my current stereo is made by Melkosurf.
Dealer: Yes sir, but as you didn't buy that Melkosurf stereo with this car, we have to sell you another one.
This is called "bundling" and Adobe have already lost a case in the Scottish courts on exactly this point. Sadly, little rules don't apply to Microsoft. Funny, hey?
I heard that HP gives you the option when you order a computer from them, to have it pre-installed with Linux, and also some IBM's. This is I guess because they have heavily invested in Redhat, so they ship with Redhat.
Look at their websites,
Leveraged contracts are the name of the game. That's why the larger manufacturers are fairly exclusive with their OS's. If you're trying Linux, then you must have a bit of do-it-yourself spirit in the first place. Build your PC from components! Then you'll know every piece of hardware that goes into your machine, and you'll have a good idea on how to fix it.
In general Linux users usually prefer to buy a computer with a "no OS option" and not have part of the proceeds from the sale go to Micro$oft anyway. They would rather choose the Linux they want to install, and how it is to be installed. Unfortunatley, the major manufactures signed contracts with Micro$oft to license every computer they sell to run Windows.
cuz RedHat is the biggest Linux distributor. They were the first to brandish a serious looking Linux box set back in late 1998. Redhat 5.0!!!! woah! which even came with a ready to go boot disk!!! man that was so sweet!,
So right now, Redhat has the biggest Linux market share, near 50% all for it self...
hm. i think it'll be a good move if slackware can convince a hardware vendor to slap it on their machines. then again, i guess Patrick's not completely into a popularity contest.
also, i think stuff like rpm and dpkg are winners when it comes to installation and uninstallation... for slack, you've had it if the guys who made the package didn't include the uninstall option in their makefiles...
The Microtel PCs come with Mandrake 8.2, Lindows, Windows, & without any OS at all.
this is not true. they tried to sell computers with no OS HOWEVER their micro$oft windows selling licence has a clause in it that says they cannot legally sell a machine with no OS if they also sell computers with windows XP.
they are getting round this by selling computers prepackeged with FreeDOS. you get a computer with no OS installed, and you also get a CD with FreeDOS on it, which you can then choose to install on the machine.
Not to be a stickler, but this should be in the general forum.
But anywho, it is very true that many companies sign these damn agreements with others to save themselves a few bucks, but in the end it sacrifices customer service.
For example, Dell will not sell me the laptop I want without M$ on it. There usual excuse is that they need to install an OS to test everything and make sure it works. Fine. Then you install it, test everything, and then delete it off. That seems simple enough. but they wont do that.
As a result, they will lose money from me. I will just go to ebay and buy it. The one I want is available by many others.
This is one of those areas I am a real bitch. In my opinion, a company either sells me what I want, or they dont get my business. It is wrong for these companies to try to force something on you that you do not want, no matter what it is. I work hard for my money, and if I dont want any part of it going someplace, then I should have a the right to stop it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.