LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2003, 11:01 AM   #1
klod
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: shoebox (with broadband ;)
Distribution: debian woody/sid
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
Talking When do we get a graphic accelerated desktop enviroment?


Does anybody know if theres a project anywhere trying to code graphics accelerated desktops for GNU/linux (didnt find anything for Xfree86)?

When I first read about it (yes, the new MacOSX) I liked the idea. When I first saw the results GAORRR!!! Looking good

I believe they named the tingy to quartz!

Cheers, Klod
 
Old 05-19-2003, 12:12 PM   #2
mhearn
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Durham, England
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 1,565

Rep: Reputation: 57
XFree is already graphics accelerated. You might be referring to Quartz Extreme, which apart from having a silly name is more about using the 3D card to perform compositing. That type of thing really isn't possible on XFree at the moment, though there have been prototypes floating about. Speaking as somebody who's used MacOS X, I can tell you that it's mostly overrated - shifting window compositing onto the GFX card is basically a tactic to try and free up the CPU to make it appear less slow (MacOS has some slightly dubious design decisions that have large performance penalties).

The next Big Things in X development are:

- Xr/Xc, these provide an API similar in style to the Display PDF system used in MacOS, but different and with state stored client side. It will have multiple backends, allowing the same content to be printed, displayed in an accelerated fashion and saved to PDF (one day).

- Proper backing store/save under implementation, in english that means the ability to do semi-transparent windows, which in turn lets you do stuff like menu and window drop shadows in a way that isn't lame (kde does this today, but in a rather bad way).

If you must have toothpaste-tube GUIs there are skins that will let you do that, but the way MacOS looks has little to do with the underlying display engine and everything to do with fashion and artwork.
 
Old 05-20-2003, 08:14 AM   #3
klod
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: shoebox (with broadband ;)
Distribution: debian woody/sid
Posts: 70

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
well anyway.... it sounds cool !!!
Of course most things are overrated but I liked the idea! Ill probably go back to fluxbox... looks like a bit of "fashion".

Cheers, Klod
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Distribution/Desktop Enviroment uses the less resources of the PC? Shagrath239 Linux - General 17 07-29-2005 07:34 AM
Win98 like desktop enviroment? mugwump84 Linux - Newbie 3 04-25-2005 09:45 PM
Desktop Enviroment vs Window Manager maelstrom209 Linux - General 8 01-03-2005 02:59 PM
Getting to the Desktop enviroment from the Command Line id10t Linux - Newbie 3 01-06-2004 05:48 PM
Choosing the Desktop Enviroment from the console Claus Linux - Software 4 09-18-2003 04:14 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration