Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Primarily Deb/Ubuntu, and some CentOS
Posts: 829
Rep:
At home, I've always used KDE but am now using XFCE on the newest version Manjaro. In my opinion, its the best looking DE out there right now. At work, on my old computer I had Gnome Classic, and now using Mate.
Fluxbox. I'm a minimalist but openbox is a wee bit too minimal for me. Besides, I've never managed to get openbox to open apps on specific workspaces.
openbox is easily enhanced with a panel of your choice...
But yes, fluxbox for me as well. Mainly because it's plain text configuration is far easier to deal with (and comes with a configurable panel). I also use XFCE if I want a desktop with more 'features'.
openbox is easily enhanced with a panel of your choice...
When I used to use openbox in Crux, I combined it with pypanel. But why use a WM that requires an extra panel when fluxbox comes with a built-in one? What decided me though was that I just couldn't get my buttonbars to come up on the appropriate desktops in openbox. I like to dedicate my workspaces to particular jobs (for example workspace 2 is for Internet work and 3 for system housekeeping). I have a different buttonbar on each desk with buttons for the apps I most often launch from there. In openbox, all four bars came up on workspace 1 and I had to move them to their proper workspaces. In fluxbox, it's easy to specify in advance where they should go simply by using their window titles.
Overall, just anything that gets out of my way. I like the cube animation, but mainly for making windows weenies jealous. Fluxbox, OpenBox, FLWM, Windowmaker are all fine.
I rather wish I could easily snag and push the setup in TinyCore to all of my desktops. Small, efficient, fast, clean and get out of my way quick. Exactly the things I like about fluxbox, etc.
BTW: I used XFCE back before it bloated, and it was leaner and meaner then. I really liked it. If I wanted big and slow I would be happy with KDE or Gnome, and where the hardware and usage makes them appropriate either is OK. There are none I hate, but some I like better than others for those factors I value mentioned above.
If I did not need to get work done, if I only cared about it being "pretty", then Microsoft Windows would be good enough. And it is NOT.
I vastly prefer OpenBox's keybindings to Fluxbox's. My impression was always that FluxBox is designed more for people who use the mouse heavily (and no other pointing device other than an actual mouse, at that), while OpenBox was more for people who use the keyboard heavily.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.