Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am running debian sarge net installer on a 100GB HDD
hda1 = windows partition = ntfs
hda2 = linux / partition = ext3
hda3 = swap partition = swap
My problem is that though this swap partition exists, there is only about 1MB of it being used. I got this information under gnome's system monitor tool. I have 1GB of memory (only displaying 885MB of it... i enabled 4GB Highmem support, but still don't get the extra memory) but i'm thinking that the swap partition should be used because the physical memory is constantly used usually up to 97%... so 880 of 885MB is being used all the time.. even on a fresh reboot.
so if this is the case.. .why isn't the swap partition kickin in and why isn't linux taking advantage of a 2gb swap??
here i have 256M of memory, and 248M is being accounted for by linux. however only 135M is being used actively and the other 120M is full of old data that might well be used in the future. why not?
there is no benefit in placing this old data in swap, or keeping it there in the first place, so it just won't get used.
ah... so more or less... i was under the assumption that even though it said that i had 3% physicall memory free.... i thought that it meant that yea.. i had only 3% ram left.... hrmm. interesting... but look where i'm comin from... it would make a valid question though for someone who didn't know that... 1gb... err.. 885mb ram being used... 0 swap being used... so yea... thanks for the input... anyone else's ideas or agreements are also welcome
hehe, people can agree all they want, it won't stop being true!
Yeah, it's a pretty common question and i can see why it could be confusing, and seems to annoy some people... but you paid for the memory, why not try to get the most out of it?
Yeah. Linux uses all the ram. I says, you paid for it, I'll use it for something. So any ram that is not in an app it uses for cache and buffers. I t wan't use swap until the ram is really used up...
This question comes up a couple of times a week I think
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.