LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2002, 04:37 AM   #31
dnar
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Distribution: FC5 ::: Coyote ::: SCO Unixware :::
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30

Damn, 97.8% idle? What a waste!

Code:
[wayne@Criten wayne]$ uptime
  6:36pm  up 1 day, 21:07,  3 users,  load average: 1.26, 1.31, 1.22
But this one is better:

Code:
[wayne@Holly wayne]$ uptime
  6:39pm  up 304 days, 10:45,  5 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
 
Old 12-06-2002, 05:06 AM   #32
finegan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally posted by dnar
Damn, 97.8% idle? What a waste!
Mailserver man, after 4 days of being offline due... to... must not rant about... BellSouth, those no-brained @#$@$$!

I dunno, its a Sparc! I've got a friend that says the same sorts of things all the time when he looks at it, like: "So it just sits there and collects mail? It should be serving some monstrous database or something!"

Okay, to keep on topic here's a crate that just got back on the job:

Code:
fin@orwell:~$ free
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        642364     442520     199844          0      16332     296684
-/+ buffers/cache:     129504     512860
Swap:       322552          0     322552
fin@orwell:~$ uname -a
Linux orwell 2.4.18 #4 Fri May 31 01:25:31 PDT 2002 i686 unknown
fin@orwell:~$
That's Bind, Sendmail, apache, some php, some ssl, Tomcat... er, a game of nethack, no X.

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 12-06-2002, 05:20 AM   #33
dnar
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Distribution: FC5 ::: Coyote ::: SCO Unixware :::
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30
LOL, I was thinking more like Genome@Home, Folding@Home or Seti.... :wink:
 
Old 12-06-2002, 07:03 AM   #34
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368

Rep: Reputation: 64
Here's my 1.4 running: konsole (doing the top); xmms (playing Therapy); gkrellm with lots of plugins (almost 1200pix tall); ical; gaim and galeon (with 10 tabs open):
Code:
  1:01pm  up 48 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.33, 0.29, 0.21
123 processes: 117 sleeping, 4 running, 2 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:  5.1% user,  1.9% system,  0.0% nice, 92.8% idle
Here's the same machine running Folding@Home:
Code:
  1:02pm  up 49 min,  3 users,  load average: 0.34, 0.28, 0.21
131 processes: 125 sleeping, 4 running, 2 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:  3.5% user,  1.9% system, 94.4% nice,  0.0% idle
Sweet, eh!
 
Old 12-09-2002, 02:53 PM   #35
doublefailure
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: ma
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 747

Rep: Reputation: 30
kde
galeon 3window about 15tabs
gaim, xemacs, knode, acroread, 4xterm

[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 512440 319244 193196 0 5144 139436
-/+ buffers/cache: 174664 337776
Swap: 248968 100236 148732
[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$ uname -a
Linux beautifulmind.homelinux.org 2.4.18 #1 Thu Aug 29 13:44:28 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$
 
Old 12-09-2002, 03:49 PM   #36
FredrikN
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Distribution: GNU/Linux since -97
Posts: 149

Rep: Reputation: 15
Workstation (Suse 8.1)

Code:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        255708     252372       3336          0      10348     146512
-/+ buffers/cache:      95512     160196
Swap:       353420      40740     312680
and the Server (Debian 3.0)
Code:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        383344     363932      19412          0      42560     253904
-/+ buffers/cache:      67468     315876
Swap:       192772       2196     190576
 
Old 12-10-2002, 12:41 AM   #37
zLinuxz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Shanghai, CHINA
Distribution: RH 5.0,5.1 6.0,6.1 7.0,7.1,7.2,7.3.,8.0,9.0, RH Enterprise, Fedora C1, C2
Posts: 1,216

Rep: Reputation: 45
Code:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        514328     508224       6104          0     102228     102204
-/+ buffers/cache:     303792     210536
Swap:       554200        112     554088
my 4 year old computer...I haven't upgraded anything since I built it.

uptime:

Code:
 10:55pm  up 49 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.13, 0.10, 0.12
it is a duel 600mhz, so average load is understandable,

Last edited by zLinuxz; 12-10-2002 at 12:42 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mem usage in Sarge/Debian hasanito Debian 2 10-04-2004 02:46 PM
Lowering Mem usage DropHit Red Hat 2 12-20-2003 10:36 PM
XWindosw - 1G (and more) mem usage!! drand Linux - General 2 12-02-2003 12:28 PM
Question re: 'top' and mem usage... pistonhonda Linux - Newbie 6 11-16-2003 02:12 AM
High Mem Usage miketheninja Linux - General 2 11-05-2003 04:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration