Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
12-06-2002, 05:37 AM
|
#31
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Distribution: FC5 ::: Coyote ::: SCO Unixware :::
Posts: 201
Rep:
|
Damn, 97.8% idle? What a waste!
Code:
[wayne@Criten wayne]$ uptime
6:36pm up 1 day, 21:07, 3 users, load average: 1.26, 1.31, 1.22
But this one is better:
Code:
[wayne@Holly wayne]$ uptime
6:39pm up 304 days, 10:45, 5 users, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 06:06 AM
|
#32
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dnar
Damn, 97.8% idle? What a waste!
|
Mailserver man, after 4 days of being offline due... to... must not rant about... BellSouth, those no-brained @#$@$$!
I dunno, its a Sparc! I've got a friend that says the same sorts of things all the time when he looks at it, like: "So it just sits there and collects mail? It should be serving some monstrous database or something!"
Okay, to keep on topic here's a crate that just got back on the job:
Code:
fin@orwell:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 642364 442520 199844 0 16332 296684
-/+ buffers/cache: 129504 512860
Swap: 322552 0 322552
fin@orwell:~$ uname -a
Linux orwell 2.4.18 #4 Fri May 31 01:25:31 PDT 2002 i686 unknown
fin@orwell:~$
That's Bind, Sendmail, apache, some php, some ssl, Tomcat... er, a game of nethack, no X.
Cheers,
Finegan
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 06:20 AM
|
#33
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Distribution: FC5 ::: Coyote ::: SCO Unixware :::
Posts: 201
Rep:
|
LOL, I was thinking more like Genome@Home, Folding@Home or Seti.... :wink:
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 08:03 AM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368
Rep:
|
Here's my 1.4 running: konsole (doing the top); xmms (playing Therapy); gkrellm with lots of plugins (almost 1200pix tall); ical; gaim and galeon (with 10 tabs open):
Code:
1:01pm up 48 min, 3 users, load average: 0.33, 0.29, 0.21
123 processes: 117 sleeping, 4 running, 2 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 5.1% user, 1.9% system, 0.0% nice, 92.8% idle
Here's the same machine running Folding@Home:
Code:
1:02pm up 49 min, 3 users, load average: 0.34, 0.28, 0.21
131 processes: 125 sleeping, 4 running, 2 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 3.5% user, 1.9% system, 94.4% nice, 0.0% idle
Sweet, eh!
|
|
|
12-09-2002, 03:53 PM
|
#35
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: ma
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 747
Rep:
|
kde
galeon 3window about 15tabs
gaim, xemacs, knode, acroread, 4xterm
[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 512440 319244 193196 0 5144 139436
-/+ buffers/cache: 174664 337776
Swap: 248968 100236 148732
[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$ uname -a
Linux beautifulmind.homelinux.org 2.4.18 #1 Thu Aug 29 13:44:28 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
[eugene@beautifulmind mnt]$
|
|
|
12-09-2002, 04:49 PM
|
#36
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Distribution: GNU/Linux since -97
Posts: 149
Rep:
|
Workstation (Suse 8.1)
Code:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 255708 252372 3336 0 10348 146512
-/+ buffers/cache: 95512 160196
Swap: 353420 40740 312680
and the Server (Debian 3.0)
Code:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 383344 363932 19412 0 42560 253904
-/+ buffers/cache: 67468 315876
Swap: 192772 2196 190576
|
|
|
12-10-2002, 01:41 AM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Shanghai, CHINA
Distribution: RH 5.0,5.1 6.0,6.1 7.0,7.1,7.2,7.3.,8.0,9.0, RH Enterprise, Fedora C1, C2
Posts: 1,216
Rep:
|
Code:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 514328 508224 6104 0 102228 102204
-/+ buffers/cache: 303792 210536
Swap: 554200 112 554088
my 4 year old computer...I haven't upgraded anything since I built it.
uptime:
Code:
10:55pm up 49 min, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.10, 0.12
it is a duel 600mhz, so average load is understandable, 
Last edited by zLinuxz; 12-10-2002 at 01:42 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|