Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
how come there is not a proprietary graphical type installer for any linux distro, like the Windows Installer? if there is, how come its not widely used?
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wounded625
how come there is not a proprietary graphical type installer for any linux distro, like the Windows Installer? if there is, how come its not widely used?
But why do you want one? Most recent distros come with a Graphical package management utility, which will download and install the program you want + any dependencies. For example, Fedora Core 5 has Pirut, Ubuntu and Debian has Synaptic, Suse has Yast ...
well i see your points, but your looking at it from the windows perspective of it always rebooting, or taking a long time, it could be just choose the path and install, but with a graphical installer that every distro uses, sort of like the windows installer, or wise installer, i think that if one is made, it would turn more people to linux, because ive gotten turned away from some packages because of how difficult they looked to install, but thats just my thought
Not really any standard app level GUI installer though. Since each distro has it's own package manager (in most cases) a "click through" installer would be rather pointless.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.